2021-01-21
1139
#css-in-js#react
Kasra Khosravi
32347
Jan 21, 2021 ⋅ 4 min read

Styled-components vs. Emotion for handling CSS

Kasra Khosravi Founder at FeedbackOnSite.co.

Recent posts:

The different ways to use CSS :has(), with examples

The CSS :has() pseudo-class is a powerful new feature that lets you style parents, siblings, and more – writing cleaner, more dynamic CSS with less JavaScript.

Daniel Schwarz
Oct 24, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read

Kombai AI: The AI agent built for frontend development

Kombai AI converts Figma designs into clean, responsive frontend code. It helps developers build production-ready UIs faster while keeping design accuracy and code quality intact.

Jude Miracle
Oct 23, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read

The Replay (10/22/25): AI-assisted coding, Wasm 3.0, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the October 22nd issue.

Matt MacCormack
Oct 22, 2025 ⋅ 29 sec read
Where AI-assisted coding accelerates development — and where it doesn’t

Where AI-assisted coding accelerates development — and where it doesn’t

John Reilly discusses how software development has been changed by the innovations of AI: both the positives and the negatives.

John Reilly
Oct 22, 2025 ⋅ 12 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Styled-components vs. Emotion for handling CSS"

  1. Interesting read 🙂

    I did the same comparison a month ago. I built two simple blog applications with a dark theme. One with Emotion and one with Styled Components. I used the object syntax for styling my React components

    Styled components and Emotion looked equal in any way. All I had to do was change the imports.

    Regarding performance and bundle size; there was barely any noticeable difference. The Emotion.js proof of concept was like 2kb smaller.

    Since I was already using Emotion.js for my React projects I chose to stick with it.

  2. Your styled-component examples import from ‘@emotion/styled’ which is misleading, but also highlights the fact that the API for these 2 libraries is nearly identical. It would have been helpful to have a technical breakdown comparing performance, bundle sizes, and limitations of each library.

  3. The styled-components examples have the wrong imports in the code blocks. You should correct these for clarity.

  4. Thanks Kasra for comparing them and thanks Peter for sharing your results too.

    Based on that, I would choose Styled Components because of the community, at least on GitHub, the numbers are double compared to Emotion.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now