2022-09-28
2534
#flutter
Attila Vago
134042
Sep 28, 2022 ⋅ 9 min read

Simulation vs. real device testing for Flutter apps

Attila Vago Pragmatic software engineer, editor, writer, and occasional music critic. LEGO fan, Mac user, vinyl record collector, and overall cool nerd. JS and Flutter enthusiast. Accessibility advocate.

Recent posts:

6 fast (native) alternatives for VSCode

VSCode has architectural performance limits. Compare six fast, native code editors built for lower resource usage.

Shalitha Suranga
Jan 9, 2026 ⋅ 10 min read

Moving beyond RxJS: A guide to TanStack Pacer

Build a React infinite scroll gallery with TanStack Pacer. Learn debouncing, throttling, batching, and rate limiting without RxJS complexity.

Emmanuel John
Jan 9, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read
the replay january 7

The Replay (1/7/26): React’s biggest problem, TanStack’s evolution, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the January 7th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Jan 7, 2026 ⋅ 31 sec read
jack herrington useeffectevent

React has finally solved its biggest problem: The joys of useEffectEvent

Jack Herrington breaks down how React’s new useEffectEvent Hook stabilizes behavior, simplifies timers, and enables predictable abstractions.

Jack Herrington
Jan 7, 2026 ⋅ 5 min read
View all posts

One Reply to "Simulation vs. real device testing for Flutter apps"

  1. Also, a quick plus for Android Devices is the availability of wireless Debugging, where you can run multiple instances on different team members’ devices, which enables them to go through the app flow and you’d see their logs in real time without everyone requiring a cabled connection to your computer.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now