2020-12-07
2376
#rust
Andre Bogus
29973
Dec 7, 2020 ⋅ 8 min read

Rust compression libraries

Andre Bogus Andre "llogiq" Bogus is a Rust contributor and Clippy maintainer. A musician-turned-programmer, he has worked in many fields, from voice acting and teaching, to programming and managing software projects. He enjoys learning new things and telling others about them.

Recent posts:

how to use the Next.js Image component to optimize images

How to use the Next.js Image component to optimize images

Explore automatic image optimization using Next Image, the built-in image optimization solution for Next.js.

Adebiyi Adedotun
Apr 23, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read

The right way to implement AI into your frontend development workflow

Discover how to integrate frontend AI tools for faster, more efficient development without sacrificing quality.

Wisdom Ekpotu
Apr 23, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
React Hook Form Vs. React 19: Should You Still Use RHF In 2025?

React Hook Form vs. React 19: Should you still use RHF in 2025?

Is React Hook Form still worth using? In this guide, you will learn the differences, advantages, and best use cases of React Hook Form.

Vijit Ail
Apr 23, 2025 ⋅ 20 min read
deploying react apps to github pages

How to deploy React apps to GitHub Pages

Walk through the process of deploying a Create React App project to GitHub Pages, customizing your domain, and automating deployments with GitHub Actions.

Nelson Michael
Apr 22, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Rust compression libraries"

  1. Zip compressing 100mb random data in 60kb? That’s impossible. In fact, it’s very similar for all test inputs, another huge red flag.

    What is happening (from a quick look): After compression, you take the position of the Cursor instead of the length of the compressed data – the whole point of a Cursor is that it’s seekable.

    Also, take a look at the lz4_flex and lzzzz, decompressing in 5.3/7.6 ns – impossibly fast – regardless of input (with one exception that has realistic time). It’s not actually decompressing the data. I don’t know why though, maybe criterion::black_box is failing?

  2. Hi, this is a nice comparison and you put quite some effort into it.

    However, as like many other statistics, it would require additional details on how the data was measured to make the data usable.
    Such as, are those numbers from a single run? Is it a mean value? If it is a mean value, how often was it executed (cold cache, hot cache, …)? If it is a mean value, how big are the outliers, variance or standard deviation.

    Disclaimer: did not look at the Github project, since I prefer to have this information directly available with the data tables.

Leave a Reply