2023-01-31
1370
#agile and scrum#collaboration and communication
Ian Khor
157526
Jan 31, 2023 ⋅ 4 min read

What is a burndown chart?

Ian Khor Senior Product Manager @ Octopus Deploy | Ex-lawyer | Enthusiast of all things Agile, LEAN, JTBD, and RICE

Recent posts:

LaunchPod: Using AI To Preserve 140 Years Of History At The LA Times

LaunchPod: Using AI to Preserve 140 Years of History at the LA Times

Deepika Manglani, VP of Product at the LA Times, talks about how she’s bringing the 140-year-old institution into the future.

Imane Rharbi
Feb 5, 2026 ⋅ 38 sec read
Why Great Product Leaders Say No (And Average Ones Burn Out)

Why great product leaders say no (and average ones burn out)

Burnout often starts with good intentions. How product managers can stop being the bottleneck and lead with focus.

Kimberly Shyu
Feb 4, 2026 ⋅ 5 min read

How PMs decide on incremental vs. drastic product changes

Should PMs iterate or reinvent? Learn when small updates work, when bold change is needed, and how Slack and Adobe chose the right path.

Bartosz Jaworski
Jan 28, 2026 ⋅ 7 min read
How Poor Chunking Increases AI Costs And Weakens Accuracy

How poor chunking increases AI costs and weakens accuracy

AI accuracy problems are often chunking problems. Learn how chunk size and structure impact cost, retrieval quality, and UX.

Pascal Akunne
Jan 21, 2026 ⋅ 7 min read
View all posts

One Reply to "What is a burndown chart?"

  1. This is a good article on using the “burn down” chart method to track progress on projects large enough to use them.

    And this approach, along with sprints, works well in many mass manufacturing scenarios.

    Speaking from decades of experience both managing software projects and being a hands-on developer/team lead/architect, this is a problematic way to manage software projects.

    Software engineering is quite different than manufacturing, though there are some useful commonalities.

    Manufacturing is creating N quantity of a single item, assembling it in a deterministic process of known parts and known, repeated, labor processes. There is little that is not predictable. Those who assemble the items are not engineers, but technicians.

    Software engineering is creating a number of different items, much of which comes from creating new components or altering existing components. This is nondeterministic, requires creativity, and (most importantly to this article’s context) the time to complete any part of the process is too dependent on a number of variables, as to be predictable.

    Software development is best managed by tracking the major milestones (NO SPRINTS), and team leads that know if their team members are being productive or not. Coders are typically not considered creative or professional, but developers, engineers, and architects in software are professionals who are both scientists and artists.

    Many software shops have learned that the principles echoed in the “Agile Manifesto” are useful in software engineering, and work when applied to the unique characteristics of each software shop. But many have learned the hard way that using the various “agile methodologies”, especially when managed by non-engineer project managers, are costly, lead to low quality (at best) and failed projects (at worst).

    I believe what is presented in this article has some useful principles that, when applied properly, will benefit a software project. Those useful principles do not differ much from how successful software projects were managed before the “agile methodologies” entered the software business, pouring molasses in the gears of success.

Leave a Reply