2022-04-27
1272
#typescript
Matteo Di Pirro
103746
Apr 27, 2022 ⋅ 4 min read

Optional chaining and nullish coalescing in TypeScript

Matteo Di Pirro I am an enthusiastic young software engineer who specialized in the theory of programming languages and type safety. I enjoy learning and experimenting with new technologies and languages, looking for effective ways to employ them.

Recent posts:

Using CRDTs To Build Collaborative Rust Web Applications

Using CRDTs to build collaborative Rust web applications

CRDTs, or conflict-free replicated data types, is a concept that underlies applications facing the issue of data replication across a […]

Mario Zupan
Feb 23, 2024 ⋅ 15 min read
Guide to Using TensorFlow in Rust

Guide to using TensorFlow in Rust

We explore the fusion of TensorFlow and Rust, delving into how we can integrate these two technologies to build and train a neural network.

Rosario De Chiara
Feb 22, 2024 ⋅ 8 min read
Using Signaldb With React

Using SignalDB with React: A complete guide

SignalDB enables automatic data synchronization between your components and a local in-memory or persistent database.

Antonello Zanini
Feb 20, 2024 ⋅ 6 min read
Guide To Next Js Layouts And Nested Layouts

A guide to Next.js layouts and nested layouts

Understanding how layouts, nested layouts, and custom layouts work in Next.js is crucial for building complex, user-friendly projects.

Ibadehin Mojeed
Feb 19, 2024 ⋅ 12 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Optional chaining and nullish coalescing in TypeScript"

  1. I think this article could potentially “misteach” people to create types like `nullableUndefinedString` when you could mostly use `argOrProp?: string | null`.

    Also, there’s no need to use strict types checks for null and undefined when you could check for both like `value == null`.

  2. Regarding nullableUndefinedString, you’re right and, as a matter of fact, it was just an easy way to define a single type used throughout the entire article without repeating it meaning every time.

    strictNullChecks, on the other hand, is recommended by the documentation itself. Hence, even if there are other ways in the language to achieve the same result, to me, the pros of that flag outweigh the cons.

Leave a Reply