2023-07-06
2337
#node#rust
Anshul Goyal
17596
Jul 6, 2023 ⋅ 8 min read

Improving Node.js performance using Rust

Anshul Goyal I love to code and use new technologies.

Recent posts:

how to use the Interest Invoker API for better, more accessible UX

How to use the Interest Invoker API for better, more accessible UX

Explore how to use Google’s new experimental Interest Invoker API for delays, popovers, and smarter hover UX.

Emmanuel John
Jun 19, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read
How To Build And Deploy A Web App With Bolt.new

How to build and deploy a web app with Bolt

Bolt.new revolutionizes how you build and deploy web apps with no-code development and seamless AI integration.

Isaac Okoro
Jun 19, 2025 ⋅ 8 min read
how to get the most out of Cursor

Frontend devs: Here’s how to get the most out of Cursor

Learn how to get the most out of Cursor AI — one of the hottest tools in AI-assisted coding, with practical workflows and underrated features.

Isaac Okoro
Jun 18, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
When to Use OpenAI vs. Open Source LLMs LogRocket

When to use OpenAI vs. open source LLMs in production

Learn about OpenAI vs open source LLMs for frontend devs, with an integration guide, costs, performance comparison, and implementation tips.

Clara Ekekenta
Jun 17, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
View all posts

8 Replies to "Improving Node.js performance using Rust"

  1. > Rust can mimic the behavior of a C library.
    Like C++ can’t? 🙂
    What `extern “C”` is for in C++ then? 😉

  2. Rust is somehow flew above my head. However node.js is something that I use everyday in my projects. It help me doing a lot of things easily. For example, I use gulp for automating tasks.

  3. What is meant by “You can use WebAssembly to create a node_module, but all Node.js functionality is not available”? Can’t you create a wasm and bind to any part of the Node.js API with wasm-bindgen?

  4. Can we please stop writting article with AI. I could tell with the first sentance and then ran it through an AI detector, and guess what AI generated.

    1. Hi Tom, thanks for your feedback. The first sentence of this article is the same as when this article was first published in 2020, before ChatGPT’s first release. It’s possible a different AI content generator was used, but we’ve found that certain writing styles tend to get marked as AI-generated when they’re not, which is the more likely explanation here. While things can certainly slip through the cracks, our team rigorously checks every draft and update we receive for both plagiarism and AI usage, and we have worked hard to ensure that the authors we work with write original content with integrity using their personal experience as developers. Still, we recognize it can be frustrating to read an article that sounds like AI, and we appreciate your reaching out to let us know your thoughts!

Leave a Reply