2023-07-06
2337
#node#rust
Anshul Goyal
17596
Jul 6, 2023 ⋅ 8 min read

Improving Node.js performance using Rust

Anshul Goyal I love to code and use new technologies.

Recent posts:

When to use CSS text-wrap: balance vs text-wrap: pretty

When to use CSS text-wrap: balance vs. text-wrap: pretty

Compare and contrast two CSS components, text-wrap: balance and text-wrap: pretty, and discuss their benefits for better UX.

Daniel Schwarz
Nov 7, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read

Remix 3 ditched React: Should you stick with it?

Remix 3 ditches React for a Preact fork and a “Web-First” model. Here’s what it means for React developers — and why it’s controversial.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Nov 7, 2025 ⋅ 4 min read

Autogen vs. Crew AI: Choosing the right agentic framework

A quick guide to agentic AI. Compare Autogen and Crew AI to build autonomous, tool-using multi-agent systems.

Kapeel Kokane
Nov 7, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read
ai dev tool power rankings

AI dev tool power rankings & comparison [Nov 2025]

Compare the top AI development tools and models of November 2025. View updated rankings, feature breakdowns, and find the best fit for you.

Chizaram Ken
Nov 6, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

8 Replies to "Improving Node.js performance using Rust"

  1. > Rust can mimic the behavior of a C library.
    Like C++ can’t? 🙂
    What `extern “C”` is for in C++ then? 😉

  2. Rust is somehow flew above my head. However node.js is something that I use everyday in my projects. It help me doing a lot of things easily. For example, I use gulp for automating tasks.

  3. What is meant by “You can use WebAssembly to create a node_module, but all Node.js functionality is not available”? Can’t you create a wasm and bind to any part of the Node.js API with wasm-bindgen?

  4. Can we please stop writting article with AI. I could tell with the first sentance and then ran it through an AI detector, and guess what AI generated.

    1. Hi Tom, thanks for your feedback. The first sentence of this article is the same as when this article was first published in 2020, before ChatGPT’s first release. It’s possible a different AI content generator was used, but we’ve found that certain writing styles tend to get marked as AI-generated when they’re not, which is the more likely explanation here. While things can certainly slip through the cracks, our team rigorously checks every draft and update we receive for both plagiarism and AI usage, and we have worked hard to ensure that the authors we work with write original content with integrity using their personal experience as developers. Still, we recognize it can be frustrating to read an article that sounds like AI, and we appreciate your reaching out to let us know your thoughts!

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now