2023-07-06
2337
#node#rust
Anshul Goyal
17596
Jul 6, 2023 ⋅ 8 min read

Improving Node.js performance using Rust

Anshul Goyal I love to code and use new technologies.

Recent posts:

How to display notification badges on PWAs using the Badging API

Ding! You got a notification, but does it cause a little bump of dopamine or a slow drag of cortisol? […]

Chigozie Oduah
Sep 13, 2024 ⋅ 4 min read
JWT Authentication: Best Practices And When To Use It

JWT authentication: Best practices and when to use it

A guide for using JWT authentication to prevent basic security issues while understanding the shortcomings of JWTs.

Flavio Copes
Sep 12, 2024 ⋅ 5 min read

Auth.js adoption guide: Overview, examples, and alternatives

Auth.js makes adding authentication to web apps easier and more secure. Let’s discuss why you should use it in your projects.

Clara Ekekenta
Sep 12, 2024 ⋅ 10 min read
Lucia Auth: An Auth.js Alternative For Next.js Authentication

Lucia Auth: An Auth.js alternative for Next.js authentication

Compare Auth.js and Lucia Auth for Next.js authentication, exploring their features, session management differences, and design paradigms.

Paul Akinyemi
Sep 12, 2024 ⋅ 4 min read
View all posts

8 Replies to "Improving Node.js performance using Rust"

  1. > Rust can mimic the behavior of a C library.
    Like C++ can’t? 🙂
    What `extern “C”` is for in C++ then? 😉

  2. Rust is somehow flew above my head. However node.js is something that I use everyday in my projects. It help me doing a lot of things easily. For example, I use gulp for automating tasks.

  3. What is meant by “You can use WebAssembly to create a node_module, but all Node.js functionality is not available”? Can’t you create a wasm and bind to any part of the Node.js API with wasm-bindgen?

  4. Can we please stop writting article with AI. I could tell with the first sentance and then ran it through an AI detector, and guess what AI generated.

    1. Hi Tom, thanks for your feedback. The first sentence of this article is the same as when this article was first published in 2020, before ChatGPT’s first release. It’s possible a different AI content generator was used, but we’ve found that certain writing styles tend to get marked as AI-generated when they’re not, which is the more likely explanation here. While things can certainly slip through the cracks, our team rigorously checks every draft and update we receive for both plagiarism and AI usage, and we have worked hard to ensure that the authors we work with write original content with integrity using their personal experience as developers. Still, we recognize it can be frustrating to read an article that sounds like AI, and we appreciate your reaching out to let us know your thoughts!

Leave a Reply