2020-08-14
3079
#docker#go#postgresql
Michael Okoko
23212
Aug 14, 2020 ⋅ 10 min read

How to build a RESTful API with Docker, PostgreSQL, and go-chi

Michael Okoko Linux and Sci-Fi ➕ = ❤️

Recent posts:

The Replay (10/22/25): AI-assisted coding, Wasm 3.0, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the October 22nd issue.

Matt MacCormack
Oct 22, 2025 ⋅ 29 sec read
Where AI-assisted coding accelerates development — and where it doesn’t

Where AI-assisted coding accelerates development — and where it doesn’t

John Reilly discusses how software development has been changed by the innovations of AI: both the positives and the negatives.

John Reilly
Oct 22, 2025 ⋅ 12 min read
Debugging with Chrome DevTools MCP: Giving AI eyes in the browser

Debugging with Chrome DevTools MCP: Giving AI eyes in the browser

Learn how to effectively debug with Chrome DevTools MCP server, which provides AI agents access to Chrome DevTools directly inside your favorite code editor.

Emmanuel John
Oct 21, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
Goodbye, useState? Smarter state modeling for modern React apps

Goodbye, useState? Smarter state modeling for modern React apps

Ever opened a React file and found a graveyard of useState hooks? The problem isn’t React; it’s how we model state. Here’s how to do it smarter.

Oscar Jite-Orimiono
Oct 21, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "How to build a RESTful API with Docker, PostgreSQL, and go-chi"

  1. Superb article. Basically answered my question as regards persisting the db object for the lifetime of the application without any drawbacks.

  2. Nice article! Thanks for helping me to bootstrap this nice little service, I love it. Just a small adjust that I needed to do:
    – the service is reporting this log to all the calls: `http: superfluous response.WriteHeader call from github.com/go-chi/render.JSON (responder.go:104)`

    I found that it happens because of the line: `w.WriteHeader(405)` and `w.WriteHeader(400)` inside the functions: `methodNotAllowedHandler` and `notFoundHandler`; removing these two lines fixed the issue; and actually we are returning the proper status code because of the errors values inside the `handler/errors.go` file, so no harm done by removing these lines.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now