2019-07-22
1578
#node
Brian De Sousa
3860
Jul 22, 2019 ⋅ 5 min read

ES modules in Node.js 12, from experimental to release

Brian De Sousa Geek. Dad. Husband. Developer. Traveler.

Recent posts:

podrocket open claw an the ai shift

Open Claw, AI agents, and the future of developer workflows

Paige, Jack, Paul, and Noel dig into the biggest shifts reshaping web development right now, from OpenClaw’s foundation move to AI-powered browsers and the growing mental load of agent-driven workflows.

PodRocket
Mar 2, 2026 ⋅ 47 sec read
knowledge sharing techniques for engineering teams

Why engineering knowledge disappears as teams scale (and how to fight it)

Discover five practical ways to scale knowledge sharing across engineering teams and reduce onboarding time, bottlenecks, and lost context.

Marie Starck
Mar 2, 2026 ⋅ 6 min read
Headless UI Alternatives: Radix Primitives, React Aria, Ark UI

Headless UI alternatives: Radix Primitives vs. React Aria vs. Ark UI vs. Base UI

Check out alternatives to the Headless UI library to find unstyled components to optimize your website’s performance without compromising your design.

Amazing Enyichi Agu
Mar 2, 2026 ⋅ 10 min read

Designing a fully local RAG with small language models setup

A practical guide to building a fully local RAG system using small language models for secure, privacy-first enterprise AI without relying on cloud services.

Rosario De Chiara
Mar 2, 2026 ⋅ 5 min read
View all posts

5 Replies to "ES modules in Node.js 12, from experimental to release"

  1. Thank you for clarification! And one question is still not covered: why .mjs? Does it mean we should have both identical. js and mjs files in a package for browsers/babel and node?

  2. From what I understand, NodeJS developers considered several options for being able to suppor ES modules alongside existing CommonJS modules including not using the .mjs extension. At the end of the day, I believe the decision was made to use the .mjs extension because it was a simply way to identify an ES module over plain JavaScript or CommonJS modules. It also sort of fits in the JavaScript community with other frameworks and tools using file extensions as meta-data (ex. typescript uses .ts, react has .jsx, etc.). Here’s a great write up on other options that were considered: https://2ality.com/2017/05/es-module-specifiers.html.

    Browsers will be able to load modules from .mjs files as well but the .mjs extension will not identify that a script contains an ES module. In the browser, you’ll need to include the type=”module” attribute on your script tags, for example:

    http://./script.mjs

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now