2024-08-29
3726
#nextjs
Peter Ekene Eze
183861
Aug 29, 2024 ⋅ 13 min read

Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

the replay december 17

The Replay (12/17/25): React2Shell, Shopify Winter ‘26, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the December 17th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Dec 17, 2025 ⋅ 34 sec read
react 2 shell vulnerability shruti kapoor

React2Shell exploit: What happened and lessons learned

Shruti Kapoor breaks down the React2Shell exploit and discusses lessons that dev teams can take away from one of the biggest security events of the year.

Shruti Kapoor
Dec 17, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
Angular Vs. React Vs. Vue.js: Comparing Performance

Angular vs. React vs. Vue.js: A performance guide for 2026

React, Angular, and Vue still lead frontend development, but 2025 performance is shaped by signals, compilers, and hydration. Here’s how they compare.

Nefe Emadamerho-Atori
Dec 16, 2025 ⋅ 19 min read

Drizzle and React Native (Expo): Local SQLite setup

Learn how to use Drizzle ORM with Expo SQLite in a React Native app, including schema setup, migrations, and type-safe queries powered by TanStack Query.

Nitish Sharma
Dec 16, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14"

  1. So the main issue was that if we posted a new item into a list, we had to do the POST request and then pull data again with a GET to have the UI updated? And this was expensive because there are 2 requests for 1 action, basically, right?

    What we did was:
    – we had a layer for state management (i.e Redux)
    – a layer for API calls (middleware on client side)

    Upon a request, we updated UI optimistically or pessimistically, depending on what the team wanted.

    So, when someone does a POST request, it calls the middleware API, We await the status code, if it’s 200, we update the UI (redux state) and this way, we achieve consistency between server and client’s UI in 1 request, not 2. Which means only 1 server is needed (some S3 bucket for the react site files) and 1 action needed (like the pessimistically update mentioned above). No need for having a second server running the server-side components, no need to trigger a GETall after a POST to see the updated UI. Nothing. Just a well structured and organized application. And it still adheres to separation of concerns since on the backend I run edge functions for the updates etc. It’s just more things on the client. And I am totally fine with SSG because yes, first load is larger but then everything else is a breeze, not requiring calls to a server. But yeah, I guess anything goes nowadays.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now