2024-08-29
3726
#nextjs
Peter Ekene Eze
183861
Aug 29, 2024 ⋅ 13 min read

Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

How to Use React Router v6 in React Apps

How to use React Router v7 in React apps

A practical guide to React Router v7 that walks through declarative routing, nested layouts, dynamic routes, navigation, and protecting routes in modern React applications.

Aman Mittal
Jan 16, 2026 ⋅ 15 min read

TanStack AI vs. Vercel AI SDK: Choosing the right AI library for React

TanStack AI vs. Vercel AI SDK for React: compare isomorphic tools, type safety, and portability to pick the right SDK for production.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Jan 16, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read
Authentication With React Router V6: A Complete Guide

Authentication with React Router v7: A complete guide

Handle user authentication with React Router v7, with a practical look at protected routes, two-factor authentication, and modern routing patterns.

Vijit Ail
Jan 15, 2026 ⋅ 15 min read

A developer’s guide to designing AI-ready frontend architecture

AI now writes frontend code too. This article shows how to design architecture that stays predictable, scalable, and safe as AI accelerates development.

Nelson Michael
Jan 15, 2026 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14"

  1. So the main issue was that if we posted a new item into a list, we had to do the POST request and then pull data again with a GET to have the UI updated? And this was expensive because there are 2 requests for 1 action, basically, right?

    What we did was:
    – we had a layer for state management (i.e Redux)
    – a layer for API calls (middleware on client side)

    Upon a request, we updated UI optimistically or pessimistically, depending on what the team wanted.

    So, when someone does a POST request, it calls the middleware API, We await the status code, if it’s 200, we update the UI (redux state) and this way, we achieve consistency between server and client’s UI in 1 request, not 2. Which means only 1 server is needed (some S3 bucket for the react site files) and 1 action needed (like the pessimistically update mentioned above). No need for having a second server running the server-side components, no need to trigger a GETall after a POST to see the updated UI. Nothing. Just a well structured and organized application. And it still adheres to separation of concerns since on the backend I run edge functions for the updates etc. It’s just more things on the client. And I am totally fine with SSG because yes, first load is larger but then everything else is a breeze, not requiring calls to a server. But yeah, I guess anything goes nowadays.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now