Peter Ekene Eze
Dec 21, 2023 ⋅ 10 min read

Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

Exploring The Javascript Registry For Javascript Module Management

Exploring JSR for JavaScript module management

JSR is designed to serve as a registry for both JavaScript and TypeScript packages, and an upgrade to the features provided by npm.

Oyinkansola Awosan
Jul 19, 2024 ⋅ 8 min read
Error Handling In Rust A Comprehensive Guide

Error handling in Rust: A comprehensive tutorial

Learn to handle Rust errors efficiently to write cleaner, more maintainable Rust code and create a more user-friendly application.

Eze Sunday
Jul 18, 2024 ⋅ 10 min read
Exploring Actions And Request Rewriting In Astro

Exploring actions and request rewriting in Astro

Astro v4.8 ships with server actions and request rewriting. Let’s see how to use these long-awaited (though still experimental) features.

Ivaylo Gerchev
Jul 17, 2024 ⋅ 13 min read
Comparing Fiber Vs Gin For Go Web Development

Comparing Fiber vs. Gin for Go web development

Go Fiber and Gin are two popular Go frameworks that provide extensive toolkits for developing high-performance apps with modern features.

Temitope Oyedele
Jul 17, 2024 ⋅ 8 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14"

  1. So the main issue was that if we posted a new item into a list, we had to do the POST request and then pull data again with a GET to have the UI updated? And this was expensive because there are 2 requests for 1 action, basically, right?

    What we did was:
    – we had a layer for state management (i.e Redux)
    – a layer for API calls (middleware on client side)

    Upon a request, we updated UI optimistically or pessimistically, depending on what the team wanted.

    So, when someone does a POST request, it calls the middleware API, We await the status code, if it’s 200, we update the UI (redux state) and this way, we achieve consistency between server and client’s UI in 1 request, not 2. Which means only 1 server is needed (some S3 bucket for the react site files) and 1 action needed (like the pessimistically update mentioned above). No need for having a second server running the server-side components, no need to trigger a GETall after a POST to see the updated UI. Nothing. Just a well structured and organized application. And it still adheres to separation of concerns since on the backend I run edge functions for the updates etc. It’s just more things on the client. And I am totally fine with SSG because yes, first load is larger but then everything else is a breeze, not requiring calls to a server. But yeah, I guess anything goes nowadays.

Leave a Reply