2024-08-29
3726
#nextjs
Peter Ekene Eze
183861
Aug 29, 2024 ⋅ 13 min read

Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

How to fix React routing loopholes with the React Router Middleware

How to fix React routing loopholes with the React Router Middleware

Learn how React Router’s Middleware API fixes leaky redirects and redundant data fetching in protected routes.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Nov 13, 2025 ⋅ 3 min read
How I used Mastra to build a prize-winning RAG agent

How I used Mastra to build a prize-winning RAG agent

A developer’s retrospective on creating an AI video transcription agent with Mastra, an open-source TypeScript framework for building AI agents.

Chinwike Maduabuchi
Nov 13, 2025 ⋅ 12 min read

Ensuring frontend data integrity with TanStack DB transactions

Learn how TanStack DB transactions ensure data consistency on the frontend with atomic updates, rollbacks, and optimistic UI in a simple order manager app.

Emmanuel John
Nov 13, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read
the replay november 12

The Replay (11/12/25): Stop making these useEffect mistakes

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the November 5th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Nov 12, 2025 ⋅ 33 sec read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14"

  1. So the main issue was that if we posted a new item into a list, we had to do the POST request and then pull data again with a GET to have the UI updated? And this was expensive because there are 2 requests for 1 action, basically, right?

    What we did was:
    – we had a layer for state management (i.e Redux)
    – a layer for API calls (middleware on client side)

    Upon a request, we updated UI optimistically or pessimistically, depending on what the team wanted.

    So, when someone does a POST request, it calls the middleware API, We await the status code, if it’s 200, we update the UI (redux state) and this way, we achieve consistency between server and client’s UI in 1 request, not 2. Which means only 1 server is needed (some S3 bucket for the react site files) and 1 action needed (like the pessimistically update mentioned above). No need for having a second server running the server-side components, no need to trigger a GETall after a POST to see the updated UI. Nothing. Just a well structured and organized application. And it still adheres to separation of concerns since on the backend I run edge functions for the updates etc. It’s just more things on the client. And I am totally fine with SSG because yes, first load is larger but then everything else is a breeze, not requiring calls to a server. But yeah, I guess anything goes nowadays.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now