2024-08-29
3726
#nextjs
Peter Ekene Eze
183861
Aug 29, 2024 â‹… 13 min read

Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

javascript object prototypes

JavaScript prototypes: How objects inherit properties and methods

Explore what prototypes are, how the prototype chain works, and how to use the prototype chain to create inheritance between objects.

Ibadehin Mojeed
Mar 28, 2025 â‹… 7 min read
featured image tsx extension

What is the difference between a .ts and .tsx file extension?

Examine the differences between the .ts and .tsx file types, their use cases, and best practices for a React TypeScript project.

Hussain Arif
Mar 27, 2025 â‹… 8 min read
How To Use Try...catch For Error Handling In JavaScript

How to use try...catch for error handling in JavaScript

Learn how to use JavaScript try…catch for error handling, including syntax, advanced scenarios, and managing asynchronous code.

Ivy Walobwa
Mar 27, 2025 â‹… 5 min read
what is pair programming

What is pair programming – and should you try it?

Learn what pair programming is, its benefits, and how real-world implementation can improve your software development process.

Andrew Evans
Mar 26, 2025 â‹… 6 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14"

  1. So the main issue was that if we posted a new item into a list, we had to do the POST request and then pull data again with a GET to have the UI updated? And this was expensive because there are 2 requests for 1 action, basically, right?

    What we did was:
    – we had a layer for state management (i.e Redux)
    – a layer for API calls (middleware on client side)

    Upon a request, we updated UI optimistically or pessimistically, depending on what the team wanted.

    So, when someone does a POST request, it calls the middleware API, We await the status code, if it’s 200, we update the UI (redux state) and this way, we achieve consistency between server and client’s UI in 1 request, not 2. Which means only 1 server is needed (some S3 bucket for the react site files) and 1 action needed (like the pessimistically update mentioned above). No need for having a second server running the server-side components, no need to trigger a GETall after a POST to see the updated UI. Nothing. Just a well structured and organized application. And it still adheres to separation of concerns since on the backend I run edge functions for the updates etc. It’s just more things on the client. And I am totally fine with SSG because yes, first load is larger but then everything else is a breeze, not requiring calls to a server. But yeah, I guess anything goes nowadays.

Leave a Reply