2024-08-29
3726
#nextjs
Peter Ekene Eze
183861
Aug 29, 2024 ⋅ 13 min read

Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

gemini 3 and antigravity

A developer’s guide to Antigravity and Gemini 3

Check out Google’s latest AI releases, Gemini and the Antigravity AI IDE. Understand what’s new, how they work, and how they can reshape your development workflow.

Elijah Asaolu
Dec 4, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
bun 1.3 javascript runtime what's new

Bun 1.3: Is it time for devs to rethink the Node stack?

Learn about Bun 1.3, which marks a shift from fast runtime to full JS toolchain—and see the impact of Anthropic’s acquisition of Bun.

Alex Merced
Dec 4, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read

Stop using JavaScript to solve CSS problems

Stop defaulting to JavaScript. Modern CSS handles virtualization, responsive layouts, and scroll animations better than ever – with far less code.

Chizaram Ken
Dec 4, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read
replay december 3

The Replay (12/3/25): React’s next era, AI code review tools, and more

React’s next era, AI code review tools, and more: discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the December 3rd issue.

Matt MacCormack
Dec 3, 2025 ⋅ 30 sec read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14"

  1. So the main issue was that if we posted a new item into a list, we had to do the POST request and then pull data again with a GET to have the UI updated? And this was expensive because there are 2 requests for 1 action, basically, right?

    What we did was:
    – we had a layer for state management (i.e Redux)
    – a layer for API calls (middleware on client side)

    Upon a request, we updated UI optimistically or pessimistically, depending on what the team wanted.

    So, when someone does a POST request, it calls the middleware API, We await the status code, if it’s 200, we update the UI (redux state) and this way, we achieve consistency between server and client’s UI in 1 request, not 2. Which means only 1 server is needed (some S3 bucket for the react site files) and 1 action needed (like the pessimistically update mentioned above). No need for having a second server running the server-side components, no need to trigger a GETall after a POST to see the updated UI. Nothing. Just a well structured and organized application. And it still adheres to separation of concerns since on the backend I run edge functions for the updates etc. It’s just more things on the client. And I am totally fine with SSG because yes, first load is larger but then everything else is a breeze, not requiring calls to a server. But yeah, I guess anything goes nowadays.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now