2020-04-22
2616
#vanilla javascript
Andrew Evans
17207
Apr 22, 2020 ⋅ 9 min read

Comparing JavaScript animation libraries

Andrew Evans Husband, engineer, FOSS contributor, and Principal Engineer & Tech Lead at CarMax. Follow me at andrewevans.dev.

Recent posts:

chatgpt atlas for developers featured image

How to use ChatGPT Atlas for frontend debugging, testing, and more

Learn how ChatGPT’s new browser Atlas fits into a frontend developer’s toolkit, including the debugging and testing process.

Emmanuel John
Nov 20, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read

Why composition – not reactivity – leads UI’s future

Users don’t think in terms of frontend or backend; they just see features. This article explores why composition, not reactivity, is becoming the core organizing idea in modern UI architecture.

Oscar Jite-Orimiono
Nov 20, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
the replay nov 19

The Replay (11/19/25): React 19.2 async, GitHub Octoverse, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the November 19th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Nov 19, 2025 ⋅ 33 sec read

React 19.2: The async shift is finally here

Jack Herrington writes about how React 19.2 rebuilds async handling from the ground up with use(), , useTransition(), and now View Transitions.

Jack Herrington
Nov 19, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Comparing JavaScript animation libraries"

  1. I’d say that three.js & p5.js are in completely different ballpark. Even three.js is used most of the time in conjunction with tween.js (animating/tweeting library that’s not even mentioned here).
    Although, it’s good rundown with comprehensive information and example code. I just find the title misleading.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now