2020-04-22
2616
#vanilla javascript
Andrew Evans
17207
Apr 22, 2020 ⋅ 9 min read

Comparing JavaScript animation libraries

Andrew Evans Husband, engineer, FOSS contributor, and Principal Engineer & Tech Lead at CarMax. Follow me at andrewevans.dev.

Recent posts:

When to use CSS text-wrap: balance vs text-wrap: pretty

When to use CSS text-wrap: balance vs. text-wrap: pretty

Compare and contrast two CSS components, text-wrap: balance and text-wrap: pretty, and discuss their benefits for better UX.

Daniel Schwarz
Nov 7, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read

Remix 3 ditched React: Should you stick with it?

Remix 3 ditches React for a Preact fork and a “Web-First” model. Here’s what it means for React developers — and why it’s controversial.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Nov 7, 2025 ⋅ 4 min read

Autogen vs. Crew AI: Choosing the right agentic framework

A quick guide to agentic AI. Compare Autogen and Crew AI to build autonomous, tool-using multi-agent systems.

Kapeel Kokane
Nov 7, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read
ai dev tool power rankings

AI dev tool power rankings & comparison [Nov 2025]

Compare the top AI development tools and models of November 2025. View updated rankings, feature breakdowns, and find the best fit for you.

Chizaram Ken
Nov 6, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Comparing JavaScript animation libraries"

  1. I’d say that three.js & p5.js are in completely different ballpark. Even three.js is used most of the time in conjunction with tween.js (animating/tweeting library that’s not even mentioned here).
    Although, it’s good rundown with comprehensive information and example code. I just find the title misleading.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now