2020-04-22
2616
#vanilla javascript
Andrew Evans
17207
Apr 22, 2020 ⋅ 9 min read

Comparing JavaScript animation libraries

Andrew Evans Husband, engineer, FOSS contributor, and Principal Engineer & Tech Lead at CarMax. Follow me at andrewevans.dev.

Recent posts:

the replay nov 19

The Replay (11/19/25): React 19.2: The async shift is finally here

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the November 19th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Nov 19, 2025 ⋅ 33 sec read

React 19.2: The async shift is finally here

Jack Herrington writes about how React 19.2 rebuilds async handling from the ground up with use(), , useTransition(), and now View Transitions.

Jack Herrington
Nov 19, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read

Offline-first frontend apps in 2025: IndexedDB and SQLite in the browser and beyond

The web has always had an uneasy relationship with connectivity. Most applications are designed as if the network will be […]

Alexander Godwin
Nov 18, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read
Real-Time AI In Next.js How To Stream Responses With The Vercel AI SDK

Real-time AI in Next.js: How to stream responses with the Vercel AI SDK

Streaming AI responses is one of the easiest ways to improve UX. Here’s how to implement it in a Next.js app using the Vercel AI SDK—typing effect, reasoning, and all.

Elijah Asaolu
Nov 17, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Comparing JavaScript animation libraries"

  1. I’d say that three.js & p5.js are in completely different ballpark. Even three.js is used most of the time in conjunction with tween.js (animating/tweeting library that’s not even mentioned here).
    Although, it’s good rundown with comprehensive information and example code. I just find the title misleading.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now