
Explore TanStack DB’s new feature, Query-Driven Sync, and how you can leverage it to build efficient, scalable React applications.

Error boundaries catch only render-time failures, which isn’t enough for modern async UIs. Signals treat errors as reactive state, giving you consistent handling across your app.

Build fast, scalable UIs with TanStack Virtual: virtualize long lists, support dynamic row heights, and implement infinite scrolling with React.

CI/CD isn’t optional anymore. Discover how automated builds and deployments prevent costly mistakes, speed up releases, and keep your software stable.
Hey there, want to help make our blog better?
Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.
Sign up now
5 Replies to "Comparing the best web servers: Caddy, Apache, and Nginx"
I thought that Caddy had better performance than nginx
first i used apache , then through nginx for my web site xetaitot.com . WordPress is probably more suitable for Nginx!
Since most of us use WordPress like dynamic sites, Nginx is the best choice for us.
I find that the performance difference isn’t such a big issue. I’m mostly using it to reverse-proxy requests where some requests go to a backend API service, others to static content. That’s just my own take.
I’ve personally used Caddy very rarely as a proxy for a single service.
However, when it comes to orchestrating a microservice mesh, Traefik (based on Caddy) has been an easy-to-use option with out-of-the-box observability and acceptable performance.