2021-07-30
1710
#node
Indermohan Singh
61102
Jul 30, 2021 ⋅ 6 min read

Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js

Indermohan Singh JavaScript developer interested in Angular, RxJS, and Ionic framework.

Recent posts:

Build Chatbots in Langchain and RAG LogRocket Article

How to build smarter frontend chatbots with RAG and LangChain.js

Build smarter frontend chatbots with RAG and LangChain.js. Learn how to add context, improve accuracy, and cut costs with a practical tutorial.

Nelson Michael
Sep 18, 2025 ⋅ 8 min read
alexandra spalato ai hallucination quote

How to stop your AI agents from hallucinating: A guide to n8n’s Eval Node

Walk through a practical example of n8n’s Eval feature, which helps developers reduce hallucinations and increase reliability of AI products.

Alexandra Spalato
Sep 17, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read

Secure your AI-generated projects with these security practices

Secure AI-generated code with proactive prompting, automated guardrails, and contextual auditing. A practical playbook for safe AI-assisted development.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Sep 16, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read

Let’s kill vibe coding and bring back prompt engineering

Explore the vibe coding hype cycle, the risks of casual “vibe-driven” development, and why prompt engineering deserves a comeback as a critical skill for building better, more reliable AI applications.

Oscar Jite-Orimiono
Sep 16, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js"

  1. Often our team will make commits on each feature or developer branch, sometimes these may be work in progress changes. Such as committing work at the end of the day even though it isn’t feature complete or other various reasons. How does this workflow fit in with partially feature complete commits? It doesn’t make sense to follow this for every commit when all that matters to us is the squashed commit for release. Can this workflow only be applied to named branches? Would love to see and edit or follow-up on this related area.

    1. Thanks Ash. That’s a good question.

      1. You can always use a commit message which has the conventional commit structure but doesn’t have details. E.g: “type: WIP”. Here type can be feat, fix, chore and so on.

      2. Before you merge the feature branch then you clean the commit messages and merge.
      3. From there on, it’s like mentioned in the article.

      I hope it helps. I’d be interested in writing a follow up article.

      Thanks.

Leave a Reply