2021-07-30
1710
#node
Indermohan Singh
61102
Jul 30, 2021 ⋅ 6 min read

Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js

Indermohan Singh JavaScript developer interested in Angular, RxJS, and Ionic framework.

Recent posts:

podrocket open claw an the ai shift

Open Claw, AI agents, and the future of developer workflows

Paige, Jack, Paul, and Noel dig into the biggest shifts reshaping web development right now, from OpenClaw’s foundation move to AI-powered browsers and the growing mental load of agent-driven workflows.

PodRocket
Mar 2, 2026 ⋅ 47 sec read
knowledge sharing techniques for engineering teams

Why engineering knowledge disappears as teams scale (and how to fight it)

Discover five practical ways to scale knowledge sharing across engineering teams and reduce onboarding time, bottlenecks, and lost context.

Marie Starck
Mar 2, 2026 ⋅ 6 min read
Headless UI Alternatives: Radix Primitives, React Aria, Ark UI

Headless UI alternatives: Radix Primitives vs. React Aria vs. Ark UI vs. Base UI

Check out alternatives to the Headless UI library to find unstyled components to optimize your website’s performance without compromising your design.

Amazing Enyichi Agu
Mar 2, 2026 ⋅ 10 min read

Designing a fully local RAG with small language models setup

A practical guide to building a fully local RAG system using small language models for secure, privacy-first enterprise AI without relying on cloud services.

Rosario De Chiara
Mar 2, 2026 ⋅ 5 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js"

  1. Often our team will make commits on each feature or developer branch, sometimes these may be work in progress changes. Such as committing work at the end of the day even though it isn’t feature complete or other various reasons. How does this workflow fit in with partially feature complete commits? It doesn’t make sense to follow this for every commit when all that matters to us is the squashed commit for release. Can this workflow only be applied to named branches? Would love to see and edit or follow-up on this related area.

    1. Thanks Ash. That’s a good question.

      1. You can always use a commit message which has the conventional commit structure but doesn’t have details. E.g: “type: WIP”. Here type can be feat, fix, chore and so on.

      2. Before you merge the feature branch then you clean the commit messages and merge.
      3. From there on, it’s like mentioned in the article.

      I hope it helps. I’d be interested in writing a follow up article.

      Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now