2021-07-30
1710
#node
Indermohan Singh
61102
Jul 30, 2021 ⋅ 6 min read

Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js

Indermohan Singh JavaScript developer interested in Angular, RxJS, and Ionic framework.

Recent posts:

how to use the Next.js Image component to optimize images

How to use the Next.js Image component to optimize images

Explore automatic image optimization using Next Image, the built-in image optimization solution for Next.js.

Adebiyi Adedotun
Apr 23, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read

The right way to implement AI into your frontend development workflow

Discover how to integrate frontend AI tools for faster, more efficient development without sacrificing quality.

Wisdom Ekpotu
Apr 23, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
React Hook Form Vs. React 19: Should You Still Use RHF In 2025?

React Hook Form vs. React 19: Should you still use RHF in 2025?

Is React Hook Form still worth using? In this guide, you will learn the differences, advantages, and best use cases of React Hook Form.

Vijit Ail
Apr 23, 2025 ⋅ 20 min read
deploying react apps to github pages

How to deploy React apps to GitHub Pages

Walk through the process of deploying a Create React App project to GitHub Pages, customizing your domain, and automating deployments with GitHub Actions.

Nelson Michael
Apr 22, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js"

  1. Often our team will make commits on each feature or developer branch, sometimes these may be work in progress changes. Such as committing work at the end of the day even though it isn’t feature complete or other various reasons. How does this workflow fit in with partially feature complete commits? It doesn’t make sense to follow this for every commit when all that matters to us is the squashed commit for release. Can this workflow only be applied to named branches? Would love to see and edit or follow-up on this related area.

    1. Thanks Ash. That’s a good question.

      1. You can always use a commit message which has the conventional commit structure but doesn’t have details. E.g: “type: WIP”. Here type can be feat, fix, chore and so on.

      2. Before you merge the feature branch then you clean the commit messages and merge.
      3. From there on, it’s like mentioned in the article.

      I hope it helps. I’d be interested in writing a follow up article.

      Thanks.

Leave a Reply