2021-07-30
1710
#node
Indermohan Singh
61102
Jul 30, 2021 ⋅ 6 min read

Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js

Indermohan Singh JavaScript developer interested in Angular, RxJS, and Ionic framework.

Recent posts:

When To Use Flexbox And When To Use CSS Grid

When to use Flexbox and when to use CSS Grid

Flexbox and Grid are the heart of modern CSS layouts. Learn when to use each and how they help build flexible, responsive web designs — no more hacks or guesswork.

Leonardo Maldonado
Jun 3, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read
CSS Breakpoints For Responsive Design

Using CSS breakpoints for fluid, future-proof layouts

Responsive design is evolving. This guide covers media queries, container queries, and fluid design techniques to help your layouts adapt naturally to any screen size.

Rob O'Leary
Jun 3, 2025 ⋅ 13 min read
How To Use ForwardRef In React

React forwardRef explained: Usage, alternatives, and React 19 update

ForwardRef lets you pass refs through components to access child DOM nodes directly — learn how and when to use it in React 18 and earlier.

Peter Ekene Eze
Jun 3, 2025 ⋅ 14 min read
A Complete Guide to the useEffect React Hook

How to use the useEffect hook in React: A complete guide

Whether you’re new to React Hooks or need a 2025 refresh, this guide to useEffect gives you the tools to use it effectively — and cleanly.

Sebastian Weber
Jun 3, 2025 ⋅ 18 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js"

  1. Often our team will make commits on each feature or developer branch, sometimes these may be work in progress changes. Such as committing work at the end of the day even though it isn’t feature complete or other various reasons. How does this workflow fit in with partially feature complete commits? It doesn’t make sense to follow this for every commit when all that matters to us is the squashed commit for release. Can this workflow only be applied to named branches? Would love to see and edit or follow-up on this related area.

    1. Thanks Ash. That’s a good question.

      1. You can always use a commit message which has the conventional commit structure but doesn’t have details. E.g: “type: WIP”. Here type can be feat, fix, chore and so on.

      2. Before you merge the feature branch then you clean the commit messages and merge.
      3. From there on, it’s like mentioned in the article.

      I hope it helps. I’d be interested in writing a follow up article.

      Thanks.

Leave a Reply