2021-07-30
1710
#node
Indermohan Singh
61102
Jul 30, 2021 ⋅ 6 min read

Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js

Indermohan Singh JavaScript developer interested in Angular, RxJS, and Ionic framework.

Recent posts:

Build A Custom React Native Turbo Module For Android

Build a custom React Native Turbo Module for Android

Build a React Native Turbo Module for Android to access device info like model, IP, uptime, and battery status using native mobile APIs.

Emmanuel John
Feb 27, 2025 ⋅ 8 min read
how to measure round-trip time using cURL

How to measure round-trip time (RTT) using cURL

Learn how to measure round-trip time (RTT) using cURL, a helpful tool used to transfer data from or to a server.

David Omotayo
Feb 26, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read

React.memo explained: When to use it (and when not to)

React.memo prevents unnecessary re-renders and improves performance in React applications. Discover when to use it, when to avoid it, and how it compares to useMemo and useCallback.

Emmanuel John
Feb 26, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read
React useCallback: When And How To Use It For Better Performance

React useCallback: When and how to use it for better performance

Learn how React’s useCallback hook boosts performance by memoizing functions and preventing unnecessary re-renders with practical examples and best practices.

Emmanuel John
Feb 26, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js"

  1. Often our team will make commits on each feature or developer branch, sometimes these may be work in progress changes. Such as committing work at the end of the day even though it isn’t feature complete or other various reasons. How does this workflow fit in with partially feature complete commits? It doesn’t make sense to follow this for every commit when all that matters to us is the squashed commit for release. Can this workflow only be applied to named branches? Would love to see and edit or follow-up on this related area.

    1. Thanks Ash. That’s a good question.

      1. You can always use a commit message which has the conventional commit structure but doesn’t have details. E.g: “type: WIP”. Here type can be feat, fix, chore and so on.

      2. Before you merge the feature branch then you clean the commit messages and merge.
      3. From there on, it’s like mentioned in the article.

      I hope it helps. I’d be interested in writing a follow up article.

      Thanks.

Leave a Reply