2021-07-30
1710
#node
Indermohan Singh
61102
Jul 30, 2021 ⋅ 6 min read

Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js

Indermohan Singh JavaScript developer interested in Angular, RxJS, and Ionic framework.

Recent posts:

Vue logo over a brown background.

A guide to two-way binding in Vue

Learn how to implement one-way and two-way data binding in Vue.js, using v-model and advanced techniques like defineModel for better apps.

David Omotayo
Nov 22, 2024 ⋅ 10 min read
TypeScript logo over a pink and white background.

Drizzle vs. Prisma: Which ORM is best for your project?

Compare Prisma and Drizzle ORMs to learn their differences, strengths, and weaknesses for data access and migrations.

Temitope Oyedele
Nov 21, 2024 ⋅ 10 min read
Practical Implementation Of The Rule Of Least Power For Developers

Practical implementation of the Rule of Least Power for developers

It’s easy for devs to default to JavaScript to fix every problem. Let’s use the RoLP to find simpler alternatives with HTML and CSS.

Timonwa Akintokun
Nov 21, 2024 ⋅ 8 min read
Rust logo over black marble background.

Handling memory leaks in Rust

Learn how to manage memory leaks in Rust, avoid unsafe behavior, and use tools like weak references to ensure efficient programs.

Ukeje Goodness
Nov 20, 2024 ⋅ 4 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js"

  1. Often our team will make commits on each feature or developer branch, sometimes these may be work in progress changes. Such as committing work at the end of the day even though it isn’t feature complete or other various reasons. How does this workflow fit in with partially feature complete commits? It doesn’t make sense to follow this for every commit when all that matters to us is the squashed commit for release. Can this workflow only be applied to named branches? Would love to see and edit or follow-up on this related area.

    1. Thanks Ash. That’s a good question.

      1. You can always use a commit message which has the conventional commit structure but doesn’t have details. E.g: “type: WIP”. Here type can be feat, fix, chore and so on.

      2. Before you merge the feature branch then you clean the commit messages and merge.
      3. From there on, it’s like mentioned in the article.

      I hope it helps. I’d be interested in writing a follow up article.

      Thanks.

Leave a Reply