2021-07-30
1710
#node
Indermohan Singh
61102
Jul 30, 2021 ⋅ 6 min read

Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js

Indermohan Singh JavaScript developer interested in Angular, RxJS, and Ionic framework.

Recent posts:

5 Reasons your AI app fails in production (And how to fix it)

5 reasons your AI app fails in production (and how to fix it)

If your AI app or agent works perfectly in development but falls apart in production, you’re not alone. In a […]

Elijah Asaolu
Mar 10, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read
State of JavaScript 2025 survey result showing ESLint as the most used Utility by developers

Speed kills: It’s time to retire ESLint and migrate to Oxlint

Compare ESLint and Oxlint, benchmark real speed gains, and learn when migrating to Oxlint makes sense for modern JavaScript teams.

Amazing Enyichi Agu
Mar 10, 2026 ⋅ 6 min read
knowledge sharing techniques for engineering teams

Why engineering knowledge disappears as teams scale (and how to fight it)

Discover five practical ways to scale knowledge sharing across engineering teams and reduce onboarding time, bottlenecks, and lost context.

Marie Starck
Mar 4, 2026 ⋅ 6 min read
replay march 4

The Replay (3/4/26): Eng knowledge gaps, OpenClaw, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the March 4th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Mar 4, 2026 ⋅ 27 sec read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js"

  1. Often our team will make commits on each feature or developer branch, sometimes these may be work in progress changes. Such as committing work at the end of the day even though it isn’t feature complete or other various reasons. How does this workflow fit in with partially feature complete commits? It doesn’t make sense to follow this for every commit when all that matters to us is the squashed commit for release. Can this workflow only be applied to named branches? Would love to see and edit or follow-up on this related area.

    1. Thanks Ash. That’s a good question.

      1. You can always use a commit message which has the conventional commit structure but doesn’t have details. E.g: “type: WIP”. Here type can be feat, fix, chore and so on.

      2. Before you merge the feature branch then you clean the commit messages and merge.
      3. From there on, it’s like mentioned in the article.

      I hope it helps. I’d be interested in writing a follow up article.

      Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now