2021-07-30
1710
#node
Indermohan Singh
61102
Jul 30, 2021 ⋅ 6 min read

Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js

Indermohan Singh JavaScript developer interested in Angular, RxJS, and Ionic framework.

Recent posts:

How to manage JavaScript closures in React

The proper handling of JavaScript closures is essential to any JavaScript project. In React projects specifically, closures can manifest themselves […]

Tanishka Kashikar
Mar 24, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read
array filter method javascript

How to use the array filter() method in JavaScript

Learn about the array filter() method, from its basic syntax and use cases to more advanced techniques like chaining with map() and reduce().

Abiola Farounbi
Mar 24, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
css vertical alignment

CSS vertical alignment: Best practices and examples

CSS has come a long way, making vertical alignment easier than ever. Learn about this concept and explore some of the best CSS vertical alignment techniques.

Facundo Corradini
Mar 23, 2025 ⋅ 8 min read
How to win clients with a Flutter web demo that feels real

How to win clients with a Flutter web demo that feels real

Use Flutter to build browser-based app demos that help clients visualize the product, speed up buy-in, and close deals faster.

Lewis Cianci
Mar 21, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js"

  1. Often our team will make commits on each feature or developer branch, sometimes these may be work in progress changes. Such as committing work at the end of the day even though it isn’t feature complete or other various reasons. How does this workflow fit in with partially feature complete commits? It doesn’t make sense to follow this for every commit when all that matters to us is the squashed commit for release. Can this workflow only be applied to named branches? Would love to see and edit or follow-up on this related area.

    1. Thanks Ash. That’s a good question.

      1. You can always use a commit message which has the conventional commit structure but doesn’t have details. E.g: “type: WIP”. Here type can be feat, fix, chore and so on.

      2. Before you merge the feature branch then you clean the commit messages and merge.
      3. From there on, it’s like mentioned in the article.

      I hope it helps. I’d be interested in writing a follow up article.

      Thanks.

Leave a Reply