2021-06-04
2977
#vanilla javascript
Paul Ryan
9379
Jun 4, 2021 ⋅ 10 min read

Know your JavaScript data structures

Paul Ryan Developer hailing from Ireland. Loves all things JS and also starting to fall in love with SVGs!

Recent posts:

gemini 3 and antigravity

A developer’s guide to Antigravity and Gemini 3

Check out Google’s latest AI releases, Gemini and the Antigravity AI IDE. Understand what’s new, how they work, and how they can reshape your development workflow.

Elijah Asaolu
Dec 4, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
bun 1.3 javascript runtime what's new

Bun 1.3: Is it time for devs to rethink the Node stack?

Learn about Bun 1.3, which marks a shift from fast runtime to full JS toolchain—and see the impact of Anthropic’s acquisition of Bun.

Alex Merced
Dec 4, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read

Stop using JavaScript to solve CSS problems

Stop defaulting to JavaScript. Modern CSS handles virtualization, responsive layouts, and scroll animations better than ever – with far less code.

Chizaram Ken
Dec 4, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read
replay december 3

The Replay (12/3/25): React’s next era, AI code review tools, and more

React’s next era, AI code review tools, and more: discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the December 3rd issue.

Matt MacCormack
Dec 3, 2025 ⋅ 30 sec read
View all posts

7 Replies to "Know your JavaScript data structures"

  1. Stack implementation has few errors.
    For example try this code:
    var stack = new Stack();
    stack.push(1);
    stack.peek(); // –> 1
    stack.peek(); // –> undefined, because this._length became -1
    Same problem with pop() method – you decrement this._length three times

  2. `–this.length` is used in error 3 times – decrementing the values instead of retrieving the position. It’s a pretty fundamental error for a data structures tutorial

  3. Hi, in Linked list when I want to remove last node(which is tail), the value of tail stays the same even if it’s deleted. Would this be good way to chage value of the tail? Im still learning.

    if(currentNode === this.tail){
    this.tail = previousNode;
    previousNode.next = currentNode.next;
    return;
    }

  4. There’s a few bugs in the Queue implementation e.g. the `dequeue()` method doesn’t have a `return` statement, so the `firstVal` isn’t returned. If `enqueue(val)` is called multiple times the length can become a negative number, meaning subsequent `peek()` calls return undefined, even after adding values

  5. I updated the article to use an array for the queue, as a note though you wouldn’t use `push` you would use `unshift`

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now