2024-08-29
3726
#nextjs
Peter Ekene Eze
183861
Aug 29, 2024 ⋅ 13 min read

Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

Cache components in Next.js: Faster pages with partial pre-rendering

Cache components in Next.js: Faster pages with partial pre-rendering

Cache components change how rendering decisions are made in Next.js, allowing static and dynamic UI to coexist on the same page without blocking the initial render.

Temitope Oyedele
Jan 30, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read

Implementing local-first agentic AI: A practical guide

A practical walkthrough of building local-first, privacy-preserving AI agents using small language models.

Rosario De Chiara
Jan 29, 2026 ⋅ 5 min read
A Guide To Async/Await In TypeScript

A guide to async/await in TypeScript

TypeScript’s async/await lets you write asynchronous code that reads like synchronous code, making it easier to understand, maintain, and reason about.

Olasunkanmi John Ajiboye
Jan 28, 2026 ⋅ 17 min read
the replay jan 28

The Replay (1/28/26): Anti-frameworkism, dev superpowers, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the January 28th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Jan 28, 2026 ⋅ 33 sec read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14"

  1. So the main issue was that if we posted a new item into a list, we had to do the POST request and then pull data again with a GET to have the UI updated? And this was expensive because there are 2 requests for 1 action, basically, right?

    What we did was:
    – we had a layer for state management (i.e Redux)
    – a layer for API calls (middleware on client side)

    Upon a request, we updated UI optimistically or pessimistically, depending on what the team wanted.

    So, when someone does a POST request, it calls the middleware API, We await the status code, if it’s 200, we update the UI (redux state) and this way, we achieve consistency between server and client’s UI in 1 request, not 2. Which means only 1 server is needed (some S3 bucket for the react site files) and 1 action needed (like the pessimistically update mentioned above). No need for having a second server running the server-side components, no need to trigger a GETall after a POST to see the updated UI. Nothing. Just a well structured and organized application. And it still adheres to separation of concerns since on the backend I run edge functions for the updates etc. It’s just more things on the client. And I am totally fine with SSG because yes, first load is larger but then everything else is a breeze, not requiring calls to a server. But yeah, I guess anything goes nowadays.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now