2024-08-29
3726
#nextjs
Peter Ekene Eze
183861
Aug 29, 2024 ⋅ 13 min read

Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

ai dev tool power rankings

AI dev tool power rankings & comparison [Dec. 2025]

Compare the top AI development tools and models of December 2025. View updated rankings, feature breakdowns, and find the best fit for you.

Chizaram Ken
Dec 12, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read
the replay december 10

The Replay (12/10/25): Fixing AI code, over-engineering JavaScript, and more

Fixing AI code, over-engineering JavaScript, and more: discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the December 10th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Dec 10, 2025 ⋅ 33 sec read

How to use TOON to reduce your token usage by 60%

TOON is a lightweight format designed to reduce token usage in LLM prompts. This post breaks down how it compares to JSON, where the savings come from, and when it actually helps.

Rosario De Chiara
Dec 10, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
Fixing AI Generated Code

Fixing AI-generated code: 5 ways to debug, test, and ship safely

Andrew Evans, principal engineer and tech lead at CarMax discusses five ways to fix AI-generated code and help you debug, test, and ship safely.

Andrew Evans
Dec 10, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14"

  1. So the main issue was that if we posted a new item into a list, we had to do the POST request and then pull data again with a GET to have the UI updated? And this was expensive because there are 2 requests for 1 action, basically, right?

    What we did was:
    – we had a layer for state management (i.e Redux)
    – a layer for API calls (middleware on client side)

    Upon a request, we updated UI optimistically or pessimistically, depending on what the team wanted.

    So, when someone does a POST request, it calls the middleware API, We await the status code, if it’s 200, we update the UI (redux state) and this way, we achieve consistency between server and client’s UI in 1 request, not 2. Which means only 1 server is needed (some S3 bucket for the react site files) and 1 action needed (like the pessimistically update mentioned above). No need for having a second server running the server-side components, no need to trigger a GETall after a POST to see the updated UI. Nothing. Just a well structured and organized application. And it still adheres to separation of concerns since on the backend I run edge functions for the updates etc. It’s just more things on the client. And I am totally fine with SSG because yes, first load is larger but then everything else is a breeze, not requiring calls to a server. But yeah, I guess anything goes nowadays.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now