2024-08-29
3726
#nextjs
Peter Ekene Eze
183861
Aug 29, 2024 ⋅ 13 min read

Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

How to build agentic frontend applications with CopilotKit

Build context-aware, agentic frontend applications by connecting React state and actions to LLMs with CopilotKit.

Emmanuel John
Feb 3, 2026 ⋅ 5 min read

Dokploy vs Coolify: Why Dokploy wins in production

A hands-on comparison of Dokploy and Coolify, explaining why self-hosted, Docker-based PaaS tools offer more control, predictable costs, and production clarity.

Chinwike Maduabuchi
Feb 3, 2026 ⋅ 10 min read
Shadcn Ui Component Collection Adoption Guide: Overview, Examples, And Alternatives

Shadcn UI adoption guide: Overview, examples, and alternatives

Explore Shadcn UI, a reusable component collection. See its features, pros, cons, and more to determine if you should use it in your project.

Nefe Emadamerho-Atori
Feb 2, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read
Cache components in Next.js: Faster pages with partial pre-rendering

Cache components in Next.js: Faster pages with partial pre-rendering

Cache components change how rendering decisions are made in Next.js, allowing static and dynamic UI to coexist on the same page without blocking the initial render.

Temitope Oyedele
Jan 30, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14"

  1. So the main issue was that if we posted a new item into a list, we had to do the POST request and then pull data again with a GET to have the UI updated? And this was expensive because there are 2 requests for 1 action, basically, right?

    What we did was:
    – we had a layer for state management (i.e Redux)
    – a layer for API calls (middleware on client side)

    Upon a request, we updated UI optimistically or pessimistically, depending on what the team wanted.

    So, when someone does a POST request, it calls the middleware API, We await the status code, if it’s 200, we update the UI (redux state) and this way, we achieve consistency between server and client’s UI in 1 request, not 2. Which means only 1 server is needed (some S3 bucket for the react site files) and 1 action needed (like the pessimistically update mentioned above). No need for having a second server running the server-side components, no need to trigger a GETall after a POST to see the updated UI. Nothing. Just a well structured and organized application. And it still adheres to separation of concerns since on the backend I run edge functions for the updates etc. It’s just more things on the client. And I am totally fine with SSG because yes, first load is larger but then everything else is a breeze, not requiring calls to a server. But yeah, I guess anything goes nowadays.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now