2024-08-29
3726
#nextjs
Peter Ekene Eze
183861
Aug 29, 2024 ⋅ 13 min read

Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

the replay october 29

The Replay (10/29/25): Tiny AI agents, Next.js 16, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the October 29th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Oct 29, 2025 ⋅ 34 sec read
next js 16 is here

Next.js 16: What’s new, and what it means for frontend devs

Learn about the new features in the Next.js 16 release: why they matter, how they impact your workflow, and how to start using them.

Abiola Farounbi
Oct 29, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
is Llama really as bad as people say? I put Meta’s AI to the test

Is Llama really as bad as people say? I put Meta’s AI to the test

Test out Meta’s AI model, Llama, on a real CRUD frontend projects, compare it with competing models, and walk through the setup process.

Chizaram Ken
Oct 29, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read
the future of ai agents might be SLMs

Small language models: Why the future of AI agents might be tiny

Rosario De Chiara discusses why small language models (SLMs) may outperform giants in specific real-world AI systems.

Rosario De Chiara
Oct 29, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14"

  1. So the main issue was that if we posted a new item into a list, we had to do the POST request and then pull data again with a GET to have the UI updated? And this was expensive because there are 2 requests for 1 action, basically, right?

    What we did was:
    – we had a layer for state management (i.e Redux)
    – a layer for API calls (middleware on client side)

    Upon a request, we updated UI optimistically or pessimistically, depending on what the team wanted.

    So, when someone does a POST request, it calls the middleware API, We await the status code, if it’s 200, we update the UI (redux state) and this way, we achieve consistency between server and client’s UI in 1 request, not 2. Which means only 1 server is needed (some S3 bucket for the react site files) and 1 action needed (like the pessimistically update mentioned above). No need for having a second server running the server-side components, no need to trigger a GETall after a POST to see the updated UI. Nothing. Just a well structured and organized application. And it still adheres to separation of concerns since on the backend I run edge functions for the updates etc. It’s just more things on the client. And I am totally fine with SSG because yes, first load is larger but then everything else is a breeze, not requiring calls to a server. But yeah, I guess anything goes nowadays.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now