Motion design is one of the most double-edged tools in a designer’s toolkit. If you do it the nice way, it can make the screen look better, help people know where to look, make the important stuff stand out, and even make moments that people will think about later. When executed poorly, it can distract, frustrate, and even push away the very audience you aim to engage.
I learned this the hard way when I used a parallax scroll effect that dazzled in prototypes but caused headaches in real use. It was not that the technique was bad in theory, as I was more interested in the fancy movements; it was that I deployed it without fully considering performance, accessibility, and context.
In this article, I’ll explore why motion design continues to hold a lasting place in the design world. I’ll also pick out some common pitfalls that trip up even experienced designers, detail out a real case study from my own work and what I learned from it, and share some practical best practices to make your motion design both engaging and user-friendly.
By the end, you will know how to keep motion as an asset, not a liability.
Motion has been something people use to talk to each other for a very long time, even before we had screens, phones, or computers. People waved their hands, made faces, and told stories with pictures that seemed to move in our heads. Our brains are made to see things that move, and moving things pull our eyes way faster than just pictures that stay still.
In short, motion taps into something primal. Without intention, it can overwhelm instead of enhance.
Even with its benefits, motion can easily turn against you. Here is where I have seen it and experienced it go wrong:
I was working on a project for a client launching a new online service. We wanted the homepage to feel dynamic and premium, so I proposed a parallax effect where the background and foreground moved at different speeds as you scrolled. In the design mockups, it was gorgeous. The imagery felt layered, almost cinematic:
During usability testing, it became clear that the problems were mostly on mobile. Desktop users experienced the smooth, immersive effect I intended. But on phones, especially mid-range models, it was a different story:
This was not a one-off problem. Studies back up these reactions. Parallax can cause motion sickness for a portion of users and often hurts perceived usability when overused.
Since the main issues came from mobile users, I had two clear options:
I ended up doing both. Why? Because the core issue was on mobile, desktop users had more screen real estate and stronger hardware, so the motion was less of a problem there. On mobile, I replaced most of the decorative parallax with fade-ins for headlines and gentle scale effects on key calls-to-action. These animations guided attention without slowing performance or causing discomfort:
The result — Testing after these changes showed fewer reports of discomfort, faster load times, and users noticing the main messaging more quickly.
Here is a distilled checklist of what works and why:
Motion design goes beyond simply making visuals attractive. It is about enhancing usability, communicating clearly, and reinforcing brand personality. “My parallax fail” taught me that motion without clear intent and careful execution can undermine all of those goals.
The takeaway? Treat motion as you would any other UX element. Test it, measure its impact, and be willing to dial it back if it is not serving the user. When it is done thoughtfully, motion does not just make a product feel alive; it makes it feel effortless.
LogRocket's Galileo AI watches sessions and understands user feedback for you, automating the most time-intensive parts of your job and giving you more time to focus on great design.
See how design choices, interactions, and issues affect your users — get a demo of LogRocket today.
Small qualitative samples aren’t a weakness. They’re a strategy. This guide breaks down the evidence, the mindset gap, and how to build trust around research decisions.
From pixel art to neon palettes, retro design is resurging across marketing, gaming, fashion, and indie web. Learn how nostalgia, brand differentiation, and anti-minimalism fatigue are shaping modern UX and how to balance style with usability.
90s website design was a maximalist playground of GIFs, bold colors, quirky fonts, and textured layouts. Learn how this experimental era influenced modern flat design, UX principles, and the nostalgic design trends of today.
Nostalgic design taps into familiar visuals and interactions to trigger happy memories, boost engagement, and foster brand loyalty. Learn how typography, color, sound, and retro patterns can evoke positive emotions while keeping your UX accessible and functional.
Learn more →
One Reply to "Motion design is cool, but can hurt users — here’s how I fixed it"
Build A GIF demonstrating the updated design with the parallax effect replaced by subtle fade-ins and gentle scale animations, resulting in smoother scrolling and improved user comfort.
The result — Testing after these changes showed fewer reports of discomfort, faster load times, and users noticing the main messaging more quickly.
Best practices for motion design
Here is a distilled checklist of what works and why:
Start with purpose — Motion should have a job: guide attention, signal change, provide feedback. If it is just “because it looks cool,” reconsiderRespect user preferences — Implement prefers-reduced-motion and consider manual toggles for animations over five secondsKeep it quick — For the majority of UI animations, a duration of 200–500ms strikes the perfect balance, noticeable without losing that quick, responsive feelAvoid motion-dependent essentials — Never make critical interactions rely entirely on animation cues. Provide static equivalentsTest across devices — Always check motion on lower-end hardware. A smooth effect on your design laptop might stutter badly elsewhereEnhance clarity, not compete with content — Motion should make the interface easier to understand, not distract from the taskConclusion
Motion design goes beyond simply making visuals attractive. It is about enhancing usability, communicating clearly, and reinforcing brand personality. “My parallax fail” taught me that motion without clear intent and careful execution can undermine all of those goals.
The takeaway? Treat motion as you would any other UX element. Test it, measure its impact, and be willing to dial it back if it is not serving the user. When it is done thoughtfully, motion does not just make a product feel alive; it makes it feel effortless.
P S + Build Custom Samsung DESKTOP.OS.S938USGS25U.SPR.VZW5gLTE REGISTERED OFFICIAL UxUiGui@logrocket