A/B testing vs. multivariate testing: When to use each UX testing method

A/B testing allows us to select the best-performing design version from two distinct design versions, usually by modifying only a single design element. It’s a very effective technique for evaluating one major design element change against the original version, but what if you have to test multiple design element changes?

Multivariate testing helps us evaluate more than two design versions with multiple design element changes at once and identify the best-performing design element combination. Let’s understand what multivariate testing is, compare it with A/B testing, and when you should prefer using it over A/B testing.

What is multivariate testing?

In UI/UX design, multivariate testing (MVT) is a UX design experimentation method that evaluates multiple design versions (more than two) by using combinations of multiple interdependent design elements. It focuses on selecting the best-performing design element setup by evaluating all possible configurations:

Here are some examples of MVT:

• Finding the best-performing hero section design by doing an MVT for 2 headline variants, 3 CTA variants, and 2 background imagery variants. This MVT runs 12 total hero sections (2 x 3 x 2 = 12)
• Identifying the best-performing ecommerce product item card design using an MVT for 2 price label positionings, 2 thumbnail image styles, and 2 CTA button colors. This MVT runs 8 total item card combinations (2 x 2 x 2 = 8)

Steps in multivariate testing

In an MVT, you’ll have to go through the following steps, from defining the test goals to analysis:

Over 200k developers and product managers use LogRocket to create better digital experiences

Learn more →

• Defining the goals and metrics: First, understand why you should use MVT for the specific design region. Answer the question “Why should I do an MVT?” and clearly define why an MVT should be done. Then, define metrics to measure success, e.g., doing an MVT to increase the conversion rate of the hero section. You’ll also have to define a statistical hypothesis if you are doing a p-value-based analysis
• Selecting variables: Unlike A/B testing, MVT involves multiple design elements. Select variables, usually design elements, that produce multiple design combinations, e.g., CTA button, hero section heading, item thumbnail, etc.
• Creating variants: Create designs for all possible design combinations based on variables. For example, if your MVT’s variables are CTA and heading, and each has 2 variants, you’ll have to create 4 designs
• Experimentation: Run the MVT using either the 50/50% traffic split or the multi-armed bandits method under p-value or Bayesian evaluation foundation. You’ll generally redirect traffic to all combinations to identify what performs best
• Analysis and deployment: Prove which design version will likely perform best using the p-value statistical method or the Bayesian probabilistic method, then send it for deployment

Note that you don’t need to perform these steps manually since popular UX testing tools like Optimizely and VWO automate MVT.

Benefits of multivariate testing

Using MVT comes with the following benefits compared to A/B testing:

• Testing multiple design elements: You aren’t limited to testing only one design element at a time — select any number of multiple design elements at once for experimentation
• Testing combinations: MVT creates multiple design combinations based on variables and helps identify the best element combination
• Deeper UX understanding: MVT design variables are usually interdependent elements, so you can form your own design principles by researching the relationship among the design elements of the winning combination

Challenges of multivariate testing

MVT effectively selects the best-performing combination, but you’ll have to face the following challenges:

• Requires higher traffic: Requires more traffic than you usually need to conduct A/B testing, since MVT tests more versions like A/B/n testing
• Complexity: More design variables and variants lead to many design combinations and can complicate the whole test
• Requires automation: A/B tests can be done without any testing tools with fair productivity, but running MVT manually is extremely time-consuming, especially if you need to test many combinations

A/B testing vs. multivariate testing

Let’s compare A/B testing with MVT to understand when to prefer each in UX testing scenarios:

MVT is the best technique for UX testing scenarios, where you should identify the best-performing element combination. A/B testing is best for testing one major design change with only two design versions.

Conclusion

MVT is an extended version of the A/B/n test for identifying the best-performing design element combinations. It’s so beneficial to test multiple, interdependent design elements and study deeper UX insights that you can use to form your own design principles for your product. e., a motivational heading + a green color CTA performs well for a sustainable energy product landing page

FAQs

How to use multivariate testing with low-traffic products?

MVT with low traffic isn’t generally recommended, but you can get better results by using multi-armed bandits and Bayesian evaluation

Is multivariate testing better than A/B testing?

Neither is universally better — A/B works best with simple decision making under one major change, and MVT works best for evaluating combinations

LogRocket helps you understand how users experience your product without needing to watch hundreds of session replays or talk to dozens of customers.

LogRocket's Galileo AI watches sessions and understands user feedback for you, automating the most time-intensive parts of your job and giving you more time to focus on great design.

See how design choices, interactions, and issues affect your users — get a demo of LogRocket today.