2021-05-14
2108
#rust
Andre Bogus
48759
May 14, 2021 â‹… 7 min read

Understanding inheritance and other limitations in Rust

Andre Bogus Andre "llogiq" Bogus is a Rust contributor and Clippy maintainer. A musician-turned-programmer, he has worked in many fields, from voice acting and teaching, to programming and managing software projects. He enjoys learning new things and telling others about them.

Recent posts:

Why Go wasn’t the right choice for the TypeScript compiler

Why Go wasn’t the right choice for the TypeScript compiler

The switch to Go may be a pragmatic move in the short term, but it risks alienating the very developers who built the tools that made TypeScript indispensable in the first place.

Muhammed Ali
May 8, 2025 â‹… 4 min read
how and when to use type casting in TypeScript

How and when to use type casting in TypeScript

Discover the basics and advanced use cases of type casting, how and why to use it to fix type mismatches, and gain some clarity on casting vs. assertion.

Paul Akinyemi
May 8, 2025 â‹… 14 min read

How to format dates in JavaScript: Methods, libraries, and best practices

JavaScript date handling can be tough. Here are some native Date API tools and specialized libraries to tackle them with.

Nelson Michael
May 8, 2025 â‹… 8 min read
tailwind typography

How to use the Tailwind Typography plugin

Walk you through how to set up and use the Tailwind Typography plugin, also known as the @tailwindcss/typography or the prose plugin.

David Omotayo
May 7, 2025 â‹… 7 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Understanding inheritance and other limitations in Rust"

  1. “You could surely argue that even in the OO world, inheritance has a bad reputation and practitioners usually favor composition if they can.”

    I’ve been programming with OO for more than 25 years and I’ve never heard it had bad reputation, or that one should favor composition (which doesn’t offer the benefits of inheritance).

    When programming UI there is simply no alternative, and the lack of inheritance in Rust excludes it from any form of efficient UI framework. The default implementation on undefined types that you mention is not inheritance:
    – it cannot act on the object since it’s generic
    – a custom implementation can replace the default one, but not call it
    – there is only one level (replacing the default implementation)

    In general like any other feature, inheritance shouldn’t be abused, maybe that’s what you’re referring to, though without an example it is hard to tell for sure.

  2. You wrote, about code duplication due to the lack of inheritance: “The simplest way is, obviously, to duplicate the methods. Yes, duplication is bad. So is complexity. Create a free method and call that from the Cat and Lion impl if you need to deduplicate the code.”

    But how do you manage to access the struct’s (or worse, enum’s) fields from a free function, for several different types? Polymorphism doesn’t stretch that far, so it doesn’t look like this is possible and that’s the whole point about reusing methods with inheritance.

    That’s why I generally avoid using fake code with animals to talk about OOP, they don’t reflect the actual complexity and the interdependencies of the actual code.

    Currently one option is to use macros, like delegate for instance, but macros are not standard, harder to read and even harder to use with refactoring. That could be an acceptable temporary work-around if the macro was part of the core library, but it isn’t, which makes it a hack at best.

Leave a Reply