2023-05-01
3287
#node#typescript
Jack Franklin
17457
May 1, 2023 ⋅ 11 min read

Publishing Node modules with TypeScript and ES modules

Jack Franklin Googler building @ChromeDevTools.

Recent posts:

ai dev tool power rankings

AI dev tool power rankings & comparison [Feb. 2026]

Compare the top AI development tools and models of February 2026. View updated rankings, feature breakdowns, and find the best fit for you.

Chizaram Ken
Feb 13, 2026 ⋅ 10 min read

How to solve package validation pain with Publint

Broken npm packages often fail due to small packaging mistakes. This guide shows how to use Publint to validate exports, entry points, and module formats before publishing.

Rahul Chhodde
Feb 12, 2026 ⋅ 5 min read
feb 11 the replay

The Replay (2/11/26): React performance wins, fine-grained frameworks, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the February 11th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Feb 11, 2026 ⋅ 34 sec read
react optimization shruti kapoor

A complete guide to React performance optimization

Cut React LCP from 28s to ~1s with a four-phase framework covering bundle analysis, React optimizations, SSR, and asset/image tuning.

Shruti Kapoor
Feb 11, 2026 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

12 Replies to "Publishing Node modules with TypeScript and ES modules"

  1. Thanks for the great article, I’ve really enjoyed it!

    Wanted to mention a possible slip: on section “Preparing to publish our module” -> “Prepublish” package.json part, inside the “scripts” object “prepublish” is used, although the article mentions using “prepublishOnly”. If I’m misunderstanding something please ignore this segment of the comment. 🙂

  2. Super simple, clear and objective tutorial, I’m not even from a webdev background and could be able to build a simple typescript based package for node and web just following this tutorial.

    Thank’s a lot !

  3. It was a very useful article for me.

    Based on this article, I was able to reduce the bundle size of my work by 20KB.
    (It was a small but very meaningful change.)

    Thank you very much.

  4. You should really read the discussion on this issue: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/15833

    The short version is that, depending on the consumer’s build toolchain, it’s possible to wind up importing both the ESM and CJS versions of the library *at the same time*, if you publish both like this. The latest advice from that issue is to only publish CJS to NPM for now, unless the “module working group” figures out a way to ensure loaders only load one or the other.

    1. It’s a nonsense. Most mainstream packages bundle both CJS and ESM and are perfectly fine. And the only person in that thread who suggested it’s dangerous was You.

      1. Wes Wigham, a TS team member, says

        > Attempting to ship esm “side-by-side” is just going to create runtime confusion as you have the esm version and the cjs version of your package both being included via different means

        Do you have examples of “mainstream packages” that ship both types? I would genuinely like to follow best practices and it’s always good to have a well-tested model to follow. (Angular provides both via a complex series of post-install hooks, which sounds like a terrible idea for small general-purpose libraries.)

  5. Hi..This was a great help. Although, I have a question. Say, I used some dependencies in my add.ts or subtract.ts. How can I ship the complete package along wiyh the dependencies code.

  6. Really awesome write up! I went through a ton of articles on the subject and struggled with this for 2-3 days. Nothing worked until I followed your instructions step-by-step. Thank you!

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now