2023-05-01
3287
#node#typescript
Jack Franklin
17457
May 1, 2023 ⋅ 11 min read

Publishing Node modules with TypeScript and ES modules

Jack Franklin Googler building @ChromeDevTools.

Recent posts:

gemini 3 and antigravity

A developer’s guide to Antigravity and Gemini 3

Check out Google’s latest AI releases, Gemini and the Antigravity AI IDE. Understand what’s new, how they work, and how they can reshape your development workflow.

Elijah Asaolu
Dec 4, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
bun 1.3 javascript runtime what's new

Bun 1.3: Is it time for devs to rethink the Node stack?

Learn about Bun 1.3, which marks a shift from fast runtime to full JS toolchain—and see the impact of Anthropic’s acquisition of Bun.

Alex Merced
Dec 4, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read

Stop using JavaScript to solve CSS problems

Stop defaulting to JavaScript. Modern CSS handles virtualization, responsive layouts, and scroll animations better than ever – with far less code.

Chizaram Ken
Dec 4, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read
replay december 3

The Replay (12/3/25): React’s next era, AI code review tools, and more

React’s next era, AI code review tools, and more: discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the December 3rd issue.

Matt MacCormack
Dec 3, 2025 ⋅ 30 sec read
View all posts

12 Replies to "Publishing Node modules with TypeScript and ES modules"

  1. Thanks for the great article, I’ve really enjoyed it!

    Wanted to mention a possible slip: on section “Preparing to publish our module” -> “Prepublish” package.json part, inside the “scripts” object “prepublish” is used, although the article mentions using “prepublishOnly”. If I’m misunderstanding something please ignore this segment of the comment. 🙂

  2. Super simple, clear and objective tutorial, I’m not even from a webdev background and could be able to build a simple typescript based package for node and web just following this tutorial.

    Thank’s a lot !

  3. It was a very useful article for me.

    Based on this article, I was able to reduce the bundle size of my work by 20KB.
    (It was a small but very meaningful change.)

    Thank you very much.

  4. You should really read the discussion on this issue: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/15833

    The short version is that, depending on the consumer’s build toolchain, it’s possible to wind up importing both the ESM and CJS versions of the library *at the same time*, if you publish both like this. The latest advice from that issue is to only publish CJS to NPM for now, unless the “module working group” figures out a way to ensure loaders only load one or the other.

    1. It’s a nonsense. Most mainstream packages bundle both CJS and ESM and are perfectly fine. And the only person in that thread who suggested it’s dangerous was You.

      1. Wes Wigham, a TS team member, says

        > Attempting to ship esm “side-by-side” is just going to create runtime confusion as you have the esm version and the cjs version of your package both being included via different means

        Do you have examples of “mainstream packages” that ship both types? I would genuinely like to follow best practices and it’s always good to have a well-tested model to follow. (Angular provides both via a complex series of post-install hooks, which sounds like a terrible idea for small general-purpose libraries.)

  5. Hi..This was a great help. Although, I have a question. Say, I used some dependencies in my add.ts or subtract.ts. How can I ship the complete package along wiyh the dependencies code.

  6. Really awesome write up! I went through a ton of articles on the subject and struggled with this for 2-3 days. Nothing worked until I followed your instructions step-by-step. Thank you!

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now