2018-11-14
1167
Alberto Gimeno
230
Nov 14, 2018 ⋅ 4 min read

Promise chaining is dead. Long live async/await

Alberto Gimeno Ecosystem Engineer at GitHub. Sometimes I write about JavaScript, Node.js, and frontend development.

Recent posts:

leveraging Lighthouse audits to optimize web performance

Leveraging Lighthouse audits to optimize web performance

Slow-loading pages can stem from multiple causes, which makes them one of the most challenging issues to fix in web development. Lighthouse can help you detect and solve your web performance issues.

Anna Monus
May 14, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read

Building multi-region infrastructure with AWS

This isn’t theory. It’s the exact setup you need to deliver fast, resilient apps across AWS regions with zero fluff.

Marie Starck
May 13, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
the nine best FaunaDB alternatives for 2025

The 9 best FaunaDB alternatives for 2025

Looking for a FaunaDB alternative to migrate to? Examine nine other platforms you can use and factors to consider when choosing an alternative.

Nefe Emadamerho-Atori
May 13, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read
Techniques To Circulate And Record Knowledge In Engineering Teams

Techniques to circulate and record knowledge in engineering teams

From onboarding to bug tracking, these knowledge-sharing techniques keep your team aligned, reduce overhead, and build long-term technical clarity.

Marie Starck
May 12, 2025 ⋅ 4 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Promise chaining is dead. Long live async/await"

  1. awaits are actually converted back to yields, which in turn are converted to closures…so the garbage collector argument does not hold. Otherwise, great post, thanks!

  2. Nice article. But, if you have to replace Promise.all with an external library.. then Promise.all is not dead.

  3. How do we do this level of asynchronous task in await?:

    const result = await Promise.all([
    independentTask,
    taskA.then(resultA => {
    return dependentOnTaskA(resultA)
    })
    ])

    The point is that independentTask is one work flow, and task->dependentOnTaskA is another workflow. And hence, neither should be waiting on either.

Leave a Reply