2021-11-05
1436
#react
Aditya Agarwal
122
Nov 5, 2021 ⋅ 5 min read

Understanding React compound components

Aditya Agarwal Loves experimenting on the web. You can follow me on Twitter @hackerrank.

Recent posts:

From custom integrations to A2UI: A better way to ship agent UIs

AI agents don’t have to live in chat bubbles. This guide shows how A2UI lets agents generate real, interactive UIs, and walks through building a working React demo using Gemini and a2ui-bridge.

Emmanuel John
Feb 9, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read

LLM routing in production: Choosing the right model for every request

Learn how LLM routing works in production, when it’s worth the complexity, and how teams choose the right model for each request.

Alexander Godwin
Feb 5, 2026 ⋅ 11 min read
React Svelte Next JS

Remix vs. Next.js vs. SvelteKit

Compare key features of popular meta-frameworks Remix, Next.js, and SvelteKit, from project setup to styling.

Alex Merced
Feb 4, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read
replay feb 4

The Replay (2/4/26): AI-first leadership, Tailwind layoffs, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the February 4th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Feb 4, 2026 ⋅ 37 sec read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Understanding React compound components"

  1. Hello!, this is a nice article, It helped me to understand this pattern a little bit better :), just one observation I have, in the code snippet you have in the article:

    “`
    const Tab = ({ id, children }) => (

    {({ changeTab }) => changeTab(id)}>{children}}

    );
    “`
    there is that ” > ” character in the return of the function inside that is confusing (I even thought it was a special new syntax of react…you never know! lol), then I checked the code sandbox provided, and I saw that the function was actually “({ changeTab }) => changeTab(id)}>{children}” which I was able to understand better.

    Maybe update the article’s code snippets to make it even clearer to new readers with less React experience,

    Thanks!

  2. It seems that the error on the syntax (that weird “>” character) is a problem of this CMS trying to clean up code that is being posted… uhm. well… maybe share the code snippets via https://gist.github.com instead of pasting directly in here. cheers

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now