2021-11-05
1436
#react
Aditya Agarwal
122
Nov 5, 2021 â‹… 5 min read

Understanding React compound components

Aditya Agarwal Loves experimenting on the web. You can follow me on Twitter @hackerrank.

Recent posts:

best react charts libraries

Best React chart libraries (2025 update): Features, performance & use cases

Looking for the best React charting library? Compare the latest options, from Recharts to MUI X Charts, and see which one fits your project best.

Hafsah Emekoma
Apr 16, 2025 â‹… 10 min read
TypeScript Is Going Go: Why It's The Pragmatic Choice

TypeScript is going Go: Why it’s the pragmatic choice

Explore why the TypeScript team is porting the compiler to Go in TypeScript 7. Learn how this shift impacts performance, tooling, and the future of the TypeScript ecosystem.

John Reilly
Apr 16, 2025 â‹… 9 min read
six RAG types you should know

6 retrieval augmented generation (RAG) techniques you should know

Explore six powerful RAG techniques to enhance LLMs with external data for smarter, real-time AI-driven web applications.

Rosario De Chiara
Apr 16, 2025 â‹… 6 min read
How To Build Cross-Platform Mobile Applications Using Lynx.js

How to build cross-platform mobile applications using Lynx.js

Use Lynx.js to build cross-platform web and mobile apps, addressing layout, navigation, and performance challenges for consistent UX.

Andrew Baisden
Apr 15, 2025 â‹… 16 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Understanding React compound components"

  1. Hello!, this is a nice article, It helped me to understand this pattern a little bit better :), just one observation I have, in the code snippet you have in the article:

    “`
    const Tab = ({ id, children }) => (

    {({ changeTab }) => changeTab(id)}>{children}}

    );
    “`
    there is that ” > ” character in the return of the function inside that is confusing (I even thought it was a special new syntax of react…you never know! lol), then I checked the code sandbox provided, and I saw that the function was actually “({ changeTab }) => changeTab(id)}>{children}” which I was able to understand better.

    Maybe update the article’s code snippets to make it even clearer to new readers with less React experience,

    Thanks!

  2. It seems that the error on the syntax (that weird “>” character) is a problem of this CMS trying to clean up code that is being posted… uhm. well… maybe share the code snippets via https://gist.github.com instead of pasting directly in here. cheers

Leave a Reply