2022-12-16
2145
#rust
Andre Bogus
148572
104
Dec 16, 2022 â‹… 7 min read

How to build a Rust API with the builder pattern

Andre Bogus Andre "llogiq" Bogus is a Rust contributor and Clippy maintainer. A musician-turned-programmer, he has worked in many fields, from voice acting and teaching, to programming and managing software projects. He enjoys learning new things and telling others about them.

Recent posts:

SOLID series: The Open-Closed Principle

Today, we’ll be exploring the Open-Closed Principle: from the criticisms around it, its best use cases, and common misapplication.

Oyinkansola Awosan
May 16, 2025 â‹… 11 min read
Simplifying E2E Testing With Open Source AI Testing Tools

AI-powered e2e testing: Getting started with Shortest

Explore how AI-driven testing tools like Shortest, Testim, Mabl, and Functionize are changing how we do end-to-end testing.

Jude Miracle
May 16, 2025 â‹… 11 min read
profit center vs. cost center: How company structure affects engineering

Profit center vs. cost center: How company structure affects engineering

Examine the difference between profit vs. cost center organizations, and the pros and cons these bring for the engineering team.

Marie Starck
May 15, 2025 â‹… 4 min read
How to pass a TypeScript function as a parameter

How to pass a TypeScript function as a parameter

Explore how to pass functions and structured objects as parameters in TypeScript, including use cases, syntax, and practical scenarios.

Kealan Parr
May 15, 2025 â‹… 10 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "How to build a Rust API with the builder pattern"

  1. The build patterns are awkward because of the borrow checker, the complexity is obvious from articles like this. So my conclusion is actually that optional named parameters are very much needed in Rust to alleviate the creation of objects with a less heavy solution that is more efficient, easier to read and that doesn’t require the creation of intermediate objects.

    Another alternative is to make functions and methods optionally pass ownership, only if the function/method output is assigned to a variable.

  2. I disagree. First, often you can get away with having one or two methods or a plain struct to work with. The builder just ensures a nice and flexible interface while keeping open the door to later changes. Also the complexity cost is mostly paid by libraries which are usually meant to be reused, thus amortizing the investment.

Leave a Reply