2021-02-11
2568
#vanilla javascript
Ashley Davis
34185
Feb 11, 2021 â‹… 9 min read

You’re wrong about singletons

Ashley Davis Ashley Davis is a software craftsman and author. He is VP of Engineering at Hone and currently writing Rapid Fullstack Development and the second edition of Bootstrapping Microservices. Follow on Twitter for updates.

Recent posts:

Fix over-caching with dynamic IO caching in Next.js 15

Next.js 15 caching overhaul: Fix overcaching with Dynamic IO and the use cache directive.

David Omotayo
Aug 6, 2025 â‹… 10 min read
LLMs are facing a QA crisis here’s how we could solve it

LLMs are facing a QA crisis: Here’s how we could solve it

LLM QA isn’t just a tooling gap — it’s a fundamental shift in how we think about software reliability.

Rosario De Chiara
Aug 4, 2025 â‹… 7 min read

Windsurf vs. Cursor: When to choose the challenger

Windsurf AI brings agentic coding and terminal control right into your IDE. We compare it to Cursor, explore its features, and build a real frontend project.

Chizaram Ken
Jul 31, 2025 â‹… 9 min read

The CSS if() function: Conditional styling will never be the same

The CSS Working Group has approved the if() function for development, a feature that promises to bring true conditional styling directly to our stylesheets.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Jul 30, 2025 â‹… 12 min read
View all posts

5 Replies to "You’re wrong about singletons"

  1. The only acceptable use case for singletons is if you have no access to the entrypoint / initialization phase of your application.

    I don’t think that using singletons to pass values into your DI container is “using” singletons. You’re just working around the fact that you cannot access the entrypoint of your application to pass a single instance of your class into the DI container.

    The backlash against singletons comes from the tight coupling you’re introducing by making the singleton instance the only instance that every class can access. I would argue that this is more of a promotion for DI rather than a promotion for singletons.

    1. Yep, totally agree although I do have access to the entry point, so not really sure what you mean by that.

      Yes! This is a promotion for DI. It’s so awesome you could see that.

  2. Congratulations, you just made the exact same argument as all other articles explaining what to do _instead of_ the singleton pattern, except while trying to sound like you’re defending the pattern.

    Single instance != singleton
    Single global instance != singleton
    singleton == is internally _enforced_ to only ever have once instance

    1. Thanks so much. You are correct of course, if you wanted to use the singleton pattern this is what makes it usable! You obviously know that already so maybe this article isn’t for you.

Leave a Reply