2019-08-28
1964
#babel#node
Joel Griffith
5106
Aug 28, 2019 â‹… 7 min read

You don’t need Babel with Node

Joel Griffith @browserless @elastic It only has to work.

Recent posts:

LLMs are facing a QA crisis here’s how we could solve it

LLMs are facing a QA crisis: Here’s how we could solve it

LLM QA isn’t just a tooling gap — it’s a fundamental shift in how we think about software reliability.

Rosario De Chiara
Aug 4, 2025 â‹… 7 min read

Windsurf vs. Cursor: When to choose the challenger

Windsurf AI brings agentic coding and terminal control right into your IDE. We compare it to Cursor, explore its features, and build a real frontend project.

Chizaram Ken
Jul 31, 2025 â‹… 9 min read

The CSS if() function: Conditional styling will never be the same

The CSS Working Group has approved the if() function for development, a feature that promises to bring true conditional styling directly to our stylesheets.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Jul 30, 2025 â‹… 12 min read
what's new in next js 15.4

Next.js 15.4 is here: What’s new and what to expect

Next.js 15.4 is here, and it’s more than just a typical update. This version marks a major milestone for the framework and its growing ecosystem.

Abiola Farounbi
Jul 29, 2025 â‹… 6 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "You don’t need Babel with Node"

  1. Module support is no longer experimental!

    I’d love to completely get rid of Babel, but some nice features like optional chaining are still unimplemented in Node.

  2. “If you want to try TypeScript without having to change your entire build pipeline, then Babel can do that as well.”
    Can you please elaborate on this? I don’t see how Babel can be helpful for TypeScript.

Leave a Reply