Containerization, also known as container stuffing or container loading, is a relatively new concept in the realm of software development. It refers to the process of abstracting software code and its necessary libraries.
Containers are lightweight runtime executables that are both resource-efficient and portable. With the rise of various deployment environments — particularly those related to cloud computing — containerization has gained significant popularity.
By definition, containerization is the process of packaging all required files and libraries with the software code for deployment as a “container.” This approach abstracts the software, making it agnostic to its environment and infrastructure (e.g., cloud, edge, physical server, etc.).
Even if you don’t have extensive technical experience, gaining a basic understanding of containerization can greatly enhance your ability to collaborate effectively with software developers. Here’s a concise rundown of what you need to know:
Containerization is a process that packages an application along with its necessary libraries, dependencies, and environment into one container. This allows the application to run consistently across various computing environments.
Containers are remarkably efficient when it comes to using system resources. They’re lightweight because they share the host system’s operating system kernel and don’t require running a full operating system for each application like a virtual machine does.
One of the primary advantages of containerization is its portability. Because a container includes everything needed for the application to run, it ensures consistency across all environments — development, testing, and production. This reduces issues where an application works in one environment but not another, a problem often described as “it works on my machine.”
Containers are ideal for microservices architecture, where an application is divided into smaller, independent services. This arrangement allows for easy scaling because specific services can be scaled up or down as needed without impacting the entire application.
With the rise in popularity of containerization, several platforms have emerged, most notably Docker, developed by Docker Inc., and Kubernetes, originally launched by Google.
Docker is an open-source platform that functions as a container runtime. It facilitates the execution of a single runtime library along with its source code, executable files, dependencies, etc. Docker provides a way to containerize applications, allowing developers to build and deploy applications swiftly. However, with the advent of platforms like Kubernetes, Docker is gradually being phased out.
In contrast, Kubernetes is a platform that supports multiple containerization services. In other words, it enables container orchestration. This feature allows for managing workloads across multiple applications. Google Cloud initially introduced Kubernetes.
Both Docker and Kubernetes are open-source containerization tools that facilitate abstraction of the deployment environment. However, they’re distinguished by key differences in application instances, service type, migration and scaling, dependency on other services, and automation.
The table below highlights some notable differences between Docker and Kubernetes:
|Allows a single application instance
|Allows multiple application instances
|Is a containerization service
|Is a container management service
|Migration and scaling
|Facilitates easy migration of applications across different environments
|Enables scaling of applications
|Dependency on other services
|Requires management by Kubernetes or other container orchestration systems
|Can operate independently without Docker
|Automation and health monitoring
|Needs orchestration technologies for automation; requires Kubernetes or similar systems for health monitoring
|Provides automated management of applications using built-in commands; handles health monitoring of containers
Here are some use cases and examples where Kubernetes-based container orchestration deployment has been successful:
Despite its numerous advantages, containerization is not without challenges and limitations. While some of these can be mitigated or circumvented with appropriate strategies, others are inherent to the technology.
Virtualization and containerization are both key concepts in software product development, but they cater to distinct needs and scenarios.
Virtualization uses software (a hypervisor) to emulate hardware and create isolated virtual machines (VMs), each with its own operating system. It’s flexible, capable of managing resources efficiently, and can support multiple OS environments. However, running multiple OS instances can be resource-intensive.
Containerization involves packaging software code and its dependencies to run uniformly across any infrastructure. Containers share the host system’s OS kernel, leading to efficient resource utilization and faster start-up times. However, they lack a full OS and may not suit applications needing complete OS control.
As a product manager, picking between virtualization and containerization depends on your application’s requirements and the resources available to you.
The table below highlights key differences between virtualization and containerization:
For product managers looking to deploy applications efficiently while maximizing scalability and minimizing resource usage, containerization is not just a current trend — it’s the future.
As we’ve explored throughout this article, containerization has revolutionized application deployment and management by abstracting applications from their environment.
We’ve discussed various aspects of container deployment, different container and orchestration tools, best practices for adopting containerization, as well as the challenges and limitations associated with this technology.
Despite these challenges, however, containerization offers an efficient method for deploying and scaling applications. It represents an evolution beyond traditional virtualization technologies by providing a more lightweight solution that delivers superior performance with minimal resource overhead.
Featured image source: IconScout
LogRocket identifies friction points in the user experience so you can make informed decisions about product and design changes that must happen to hit your goals.
With LogRocket, you can understand the scope of the issues affecting your product and prioritize the changes that need to be made. LogRocket simplifies workflows by allowing Engineering, Product, UX, and Design teams to work from the same data as you, eliminating any confusion about what needs to be done.
Get your teams on the same page — try LogRocket today.
Kevin Morris talks about the importance of not overly focusing on the inward-facing components of product management.
While running a sprint planning ceremony is pretty straightforward, a lot of work goes into the planning both before and during the ceremony.
Sam Schulte, Vice President, Product Engineering at Inspirato, talks about the delicate balance between innovation and scale.