2021-05-21
2465
#react
Antonello Zanini
49484
May 21, 2021 ⋅ 8 min read

Optimize React apps using a multi-layered structure

Antonello Zanini I'm a software engineer, but I prefer to call myself a technology bishop. Spreading knowledge through writing is my mission.

Recent posts:

Introducing Valdi

Should you bet on Valdi instead of React Native?

Valdi skips the JavaScript runtime by compiling TypeScript to native views. Learn how it compares to React Native’s new architecture and when the trade-off makes sense.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Dec 30, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read
8 frontend development trends 2026

The 8 trends that will define web development in 2026

What trends will define web development in 2026? Check out the eight most important trends of the year, from AI-first development to TypeScript’s takeover.

David Omotayo
Dec 30, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
AI First Debugging

AI-first debugging: Tools and techniques for faster root cause analysis

AI-first debugging augments traditional debugging with log clustering, pattern recognition, and faster root cause analysis. Learn where AI helps, where it fails, and how to use it safely in production.

Alexander Godwin
Dec 29, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read

Container queries in 2026: Powerful, but not a silver bullet

Container queries let components respond to their own layout context instead of the viewport. This article explores how they work and where they fit alongside media queries.

Sebastian Weber
Dec 26, 2025 ⋅ 12 min read
View all posts

5 Replies to "Optimize React apps using a multi-layered structure"

  1. I think I disagree with some of the structures shown. I’ve always found feature focused layers to be much easier to work on (vs type based layers).

    The reason being, most units of work tends to be feature focused. If I am working on Foo, I don’t want to open 5 different layers for reducers, actions, views, blah, blah. This encourages commits to have wide surface area.

    By organizing by feature, commits will have low surface area. You would modify foo/action.js, foo/reducer.js, foo/view.js, foo/blah.js. Everything is in 1 layer.

    This is much easier for both the reader and writer.

  2. You assume that only view layer should use other layers? Let’s look on this example. I have component with user details and it is in component layer. I want to use it on many views and I don’t want to duplicate code so I want to pass only user ID to component, but in this case I have to use API request inside component and finally I use other layer in component layer. Where I should use a API request? Each time I want to use user details component and pass result to component?

    1. Agree with u Jarek , its really practical to use API or other general logic into Component . But its also worth attention that we may abuse business logic into Component too much. So I guess author could give more example on how to minify the business logic pollution.

  3. Hi, I am the author. Thanks for your feedback!

    I would like to add that the best architecture depends on what you are working on. Based on my experience, such a structure works quite well, but it is not the only one possible. The one you presented is a very good alternative, for sure. I have worked with this file structure in many projects, with other team members, and we are all satisfied.

    At the same time, I don’t exclude the possibility that other architectures and file structures might be better than this one, especially in contexts other than those that helped me conceive it.

  4. Hi, I am the author. Thanks for your feedback!

    The view layer is the only one that might need to import files from all other layers. For example, the component layer should depend on the view layer, while the other way around is feasible. I hope that’s clear now!

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now