2021-05-21
2465
#react
Antonello Zanini
49484
May 21, 2021 ⋅ 8 min read

Optimize React apps using a multi-layered structure

Antonello Zanini I'm a software engineer, but I prefer to call myself a technology bishop. Spreading knowledge through writing is my mission.

Recent posts:

How to build agentic AI when your data can’t leave the network

Large hosted LLMs aren’t always an option. Learn how to build agentic AI with small, local models that preserve privacy and scale.

Rosario De Chiara
Dec 23, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
frontend wrapped top stories of 2025

Frontend Wrapped 2025: The 10 storylines that defined the year

What storylines defined 2025 in frontend development? We power rank them all, from AI advancements to supply chain attacks and framework breakthroughs.

Chizaram Ken
Dec 23, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
Getting Started With NativeWind: Tailwind For React Native

Getting started with NativeWind: Tailwind for React Native

Learn how to style React Native apps with Tailwind using NativeWind v4.

Chinwike Maduabuchi
Dec 22, 2025 ⋅ 14 min read
The 10 Best React Native Component Libraries You Should Know

The 10 best React Native UI libraries of 2026

A practical guide to the best React Native UI libraries in 2026, with comparisons across performance, theming, accessibility, and Expo compatibility.

Aman Mittal
Dec 22, 2025 ⋅ 12 min read
View all posts

5 Replies to "Optimize React apps using a multi-layered structure"

  1. I think I disagree with some of the structures shown. I’ve always found feature focused layers to be much easier to work on (vs type based layers).

    The reason being, most units of work tends to be feature focused. If I am working on Foo, I don’t want to open 5 different layers for reducers, actions, views, blah, blah. This encourages commits to have wide surface area.

    By organizing by feature, commits will have low surface area. You would modify foo/action.js, foo/reducer.js, foo/view.js, foo/blah.js. Everything is in 1 layer.

    This is much easier for both the reader and writer.

  2. You assume that only view layer should use other layers? Let’s look on this example. I have component with user details and it is in component layer. I want to use it on many views and I don’t want to duplicate code so I want to pass only user ID to component, but in this case I have to use API request inside component and finally I use other layer in component layer. Where I should use a API request? Each time I want to use user details component and pass result to component?

    1. Agree with u Jarek , its really practical to use API or other general logic into Component . But its also worth attention that we may abuse business logic into Component too much. So I guess author could give more example on how to minify the business logic pollution.

  3. Hi, I am the author. Thanks for your feedback!

    I would like to add that the best architecture depends on what you are working on. Based on my experience, such a structure works quite well, but it is not the only one possible. The one you presented is a very good alternative, for sure. I have worked with this file structure in many projects, with other team members, and we are all satisfied.

    At the same time, I don’t exclude the possibility that other architectures and file structures might be better than this one, especially in contexts other than those that helped me conceive it.

  4. Hi, I am the author. Thanks for your feedback!

    The view layer is the only one that might need to import files from all other layers. For example, the component layer should depend on the view layer, while the other way around is feasible. I hope that’s clear now!

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now