2019-12-20
2076
#electron
Kevin Hirczy
11540
Dec 20, 2019 ⋅ 7 min read

Electron IPC Response/Request architecture with TypeScript

Kevin Hirczy I make stuff. Mostly functional, occasionally shiny, stuff. nehalist.io.

Recent posts:

vitest 4 adoption guide

Vitest 4 adoption guide: Overview and migrating from Jest

Learn how Vitest 4 makes migrating from Jest painless, with codemods, faster tests, native ESM, browser testing, and a better DX.

Onuorah Bonaventure
Dec 18, 2025 ⋅ 15 min read
type vs interface typescript

Types vs. interfaces in TypeScript

Learn when to use TypeScript types vs. interfaces, with practical guidance on React props, advanced mapped and template literal types, performance tradeoffs, and common pitfalls.

Yan Sun
Dec 18, 2025 ⋅ 12 min read

I tested 5 AI CLI tools: Here’s how they stack up

A hands-on comparison of five AI coding CLIs, tested by building the same React Todo app.

Emmanuel John
Dec 18, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read
the replay december 17

The Replay (12/17/25): React2Shell, Shopify Winter ‘26, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the December 17th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Dec 17, 2025 ⋅ 34 sec read
View all posts

13 Replies to "Electron IPC Response/Request architecture with TypeScript"

  1. The article really clarifies the best way to implement IPC in Electron with TypeScript — using channels + Promises + generic types makes the code both clear and type-safe. I think with that architecture, maintaining large apps will be much easier.

  2. As a reader, this breakdown makes Electron’s IPC feel refreshingly approachable. The request-response flow mirrors how a soundboard or sound buttons trigger actions simple, async, effective.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now