2021-01-28
1600
Patience Adajah
33455
Jan 28, 2021 ⋅ 5 min read

Best practices for managing and storing secrets in frontend development

Patience Adajah Software developer and technical writer.

Recent posts:

Google & Shopify’s UCP: How AI agents sell online

Explore how the Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP) allows AI agents to connect with merchants, handle checkout sessions, and securely process payments in real-world e-commerce flows.

Emmanuel John
Feb 24, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read
6 React Server Component performance pitfalls in Next.js

6 React Server Component performance pitfalls in Next.js

React Server Components and the Next.js App Router enable streaming and smaller client bundles, but only when used correctly. This article explores six common mistakes that block streaming, bloat hydration, and create stale UI in production.

Temitope Oyedele
Feb 23, 2026 ⋅ 13 min read
podrocket 2 19

Making sense of web rendering patterns (SSR, CSR, static, islands)

Gil Fink (SparXis CEO) joins PodRocket to break down today’s most common web rendering patterns: SSR, CSR, static rednering, and islands/resumability.

PodRocket
Feb 23, 2026 ⋅ 48 sec read

CSS @container scroll-state: Replace JS scroll listeners now

CSS @container scroll-state lets you build sticky headers, snapping carousels, and scroll indicators without JavaScript. Here’s how to replace scroll listeners with clean, declarative state queries.

Jude Miracle
Feb 19, 2026 ⋅ 4 min read
View all posts

3 Replies to "Best practices for managing and storing secrets in frontend development"

  1. This information is helpful (especially the things *not* to do), but it still does not provide enough advice on what *to* do to avoid exposing secrets in your downloaded application code – even if they are configured with environment variables.

    An approach I’m using — in an application that involves some sort of user authentication mechanism — is to store each user’s secrets in the server side user information database, and provide an API call that allows an authenticated user to download them. (Obviously, use SSL/TLS on this API call!) This approach avoids the problems of embedding secrets, and (if they are truly user-specific, like Gmail credentials) allows the users to manage them just like they manage the rest of their profile. If the secrets are global to the application (i.e. your organization signed up for them on behalf of all the users), still provide the API call, but never expose the secrets in the UI anywhere.

    This is still not a perfect defense against someone armed with the ability to do client side debugging in the browser, but makes life significantly more difficult for them.

  2. Having secrets in the frontend code is **always** a bad practice. You can obscure them using some techniques but I think it will create a false sense of security. I.E.: Any API key you have in your code will be sent clearly in the request to the corresponding service, no matter how hidden it’s in the code.
    Any reputable service will always have both private and public API keys if necessary.
    Another topic would be that you want to parametrize secrets. In fact, it is recommended, but it must not be confused with a security measure.

  3. You can use a middleware service to help you store and secure your API secrets then proxy the API calls to your frontend. This is the best way of going about it if you don’t want to set up your own backend server. We used a platform called KOR Connect, they simplified the whole connection into a couple simple steps as well as created their own layers of security on top of the regular proxy. Might be worth looking into?

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now