2021-07-30
1710
#node
Indermohan Singh
61102
Jul 30, 2021 ⋅ 6 min read

Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js

Indermohan Singh JavaScript developer interested in Angular, RxJS, and Ionic framework.

Recent posts:

Task Scheduling and cron Jobs in Node Using node-cron

Scheduling tasks in Node.js using node-cron

From basic syntax and advanced techniques to practical applications and error handling, here’s how to use node-cron.

Godwin Ekuma
Nov 12, 2024 ⋅ 7 min read
Working With The Angular Tree: Flat Vs Nested Trees And More

Working with the Angular tree

The Angular tree view can be hard to get right, but once you understand it, it can be quite a powerful visual representation.

Lewis Cianci
Nov 12, 2024 ⋅ 21 min read
Relay logo with an orange circuit-like path on a blue background, representing the Relay GraphQL client. The article covers building real-time applications in Relay 17, including features like optimistic UI updates, GraphQL subscriptions, and Relay Resolvers.

Building a real-time application with Relay 17

Build a fast, real-time app with Relay 17 to leverage features like optimistic UI updates, GraphQL subscriptions, and seamless data syncing.

Alec Brunelle
Nov 12, 2024 ⋅ 9 min read
Vue.js logo over a dark, textured purple background. The article discusses using defineExpose and in Vue 3 to enhance component interaction and enable dynamic theming.

defineExpose and <style vars> in Vue 3 for component interaction and theming

Simplify component interaction and dynamic theming in Vue 3 with defineExpose and for better control and flexibility.

Clara Ekekenta
Nov 7, 2024 ⋅ 8 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Automatically generate and release a changelog using Node.js"

  1. Often our team will make commits on each feature or developer branch, sometimes these may be work in progress changes. Such as committing work at the end of the day even though it isn’t feature complete or other various reasons. How does this workflow fit in with partially feature complete commits? It doesn’t make sense to follow this for every commit when all that matters to us is the squashed commit for release. Can this workflow only be applied to named branches? Would love to see and edit or follow-up on this related area.

    1. Thanks Ash. That’s a good question.

      1. You can always use a commit message which has the conventional commit structure but doesn’t have details. E.g: “type: WIP”. Here type can be feat, fix, chore and so on.

      2. Before you merge the feature branch then you clean the commit messages and merge.
      3. From there on, it’s like mentioned in the article.

      I hope it helps. I’d be interested in writing a follow up article.

      Thanks.

Leave a Reply