When looking toward integrating 3D maps or elements into your application, Cesium and Mapbox are good options.
The purpose of this article is to explain and give a crucial comparison between these two popular mapping services based on the following key elements:
We’ll also look more generally at the pros and cons of each mapping service.
Cesium provides a fast, simple, end-to-end platform for tiling, visualizing, sharing, and analyzing 3D geospatial data.
Cesium helps to transform massive and diverse 3D geospatial data into streamable 3D content that’s ready to be used in your application and in any other environment.
Globe view support
Cesium provides support for representations of the Earth in a 3D globe view model. It gives you the ability to freely move around in the virtual environment by changing the viewing angle and position. One additional capability of globe view is that it allows you to represent many different views of the surface of the Earth.
Fully 3D
Unlike Mapbox, Cesium is fully 3D out of the box. This allows for the rotation and visualization of objects from multiple perspectives. This makes the experience of implementing and compositing 3D objects in mapping services even more seamless.
3D data tiling and streaming
Cesium provides 3D tiling, which transforms massive and diverse 3D geospatial data into streamable 3D content ready to be used in your application. You could also arrange and bring together data from multiple sources to visualize it as one.
Generous free trial option and flexible pricing plans
At the time of writing this article, Cesium provides a community (or free tier) plan of up to 15 GB/month for data streaming, unlimited apps, end users, and 5 GB storage space to host and share your 3D contents. This option is suitable for non-commercial projects.
Relatively larger SDK size
Compared to Mapbox, Cesium has a relatively larger SDK size, with the latest unpacked version of Cesium.js, (released Oct 01 2020), weighing up to 79.4 MB.
Incomplete building information
Unlike Mapbox, Cesium does not provide building information (more on this under the look and feel section).
Slower response time
Cesium has a slow response time, with an update upon interacting with the globe view loading at around +3sec on a stable 7.2Mbps Internet connection.
Mapbox, on the other hand, helps developers build better mapping, navigation, and search experiences across different platforms.
Unlike Cesium, Mapbox provides vast mapping services outside of 3D mapping, some of which include:
Choose between different map styles
Mapbox provides several map styles that can either be used directly in your application or as a starting point for creating a new custom style in Mapbox Studio.
Generous free trial
Mapbox also offers a generous free tier, with up to 50,000/month free map loads for web and up to 25,000 monthly active users for their mobile SDKs.
Faster load/ update time
On a sample 3D building display test, Mapbox seems to update the map faster than Cesium. It loads at a little less than 2 seconds while under a stable 7.2Mbps internet connection.
Mapbox provides building information
Unlike Cesium, Mapbox provides support for 3D buildings information (more on this under the look and feel section).
Mapbox Uses 2.5D Instead Of 3D
While Cesium uses 3D out of the box, Mapbox uses 2.5D (2D shapes with height). This makes gathering and combining multiple 3D objects using other third party libraries like Three.js a bit complicated.
Cesium has a robust and secure cloud platform, Cesium ion, where 3D data can be easily hosted, edited, and streamed across multiple devices.
On the platform, you also have access to curated 3D content including Cesium World Terrain, Bing Maps imagery, and Cesium OSM Buildings.
Another amazing feature of Cesium ion is that it lets you create and share map-based stories without writing code.
While you could choose from Mapbox ready-to-use style templates, like Cesium ion, Mapbox also offers a similar platform: Mapbox Studio. However, it has more capabilities. For example, it lets you add point of interest labels to map, lets you change the map color, and adjust the road width, among other awesome capabilities. And you can easily integrate your design across all of their SDKs.
API/SDKs
Cesium is built mainly for the web. Its primary SDK is Cesium.js, an open source JavaScript library that streams data from Cesium ion to create 3D globes and maps.
Mapbox, on the other hand, provides Mapbox GL. Mapbox GL a suite of open-source libraries for embedding customizable and responsive client-side maps in web, mobile, and desktop applications.
Along with Mapbox GL, they also offer commercial SDKs for every of their other services.
Mapbox
The above image is an example of a 3D building in Mapbox, clearly providing the surrounding buildings information which will make it even easier to navigate the map.
Below is an example of a similar 3D building in Cesium. Unlike Mapbox, there is no building information, which would make it more complicated to navigate the map.
In this post, we covered the differences between Cesium and Mapbox. We addressed the pros and cons tied to each of them, compared the look of both maps, and established which is more popular. While both platforms offer great mapping services, obviously Mapbox offers a lot more features than Cesium.
If you are looking to host and share 3D contents across multiple platforms, Cesium is probably the option you’ll want to go with. On the other hand if your goal is to display 3D data and leverage more mapping features, then Mapbox is the best choice.
Debugging code is always a tedious task. But the more you understand your errors, the easier it is to fix them.
LogRocket allows you to understand these errors in new and unique ways. Our frontend monitoring solution tracks user engagement with your JavaScript frontends to give you the ability to see exactly what the user did that led to an error.
LogRocket records console logs, page load times, stack traces, slow network requests/responses with headers + bodies, browser metadata, and custom logs. Understanding the impact of your JavaScript code will never be easier!
Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?
Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.
Sign up now
Today, we’ll be exploring the Open-Closed Principle: from the criticisms around it, its best use cases, and common misapplication.
Explore how AI-driven testing tools like Shortest, Testim, Mabl, and Functionize are changing how we do end-to-end testing.
Examine the difference between profit vs. cost center organizations, and the pros and cons these bring for the engineering team.
Explore how to pass functions and structured objects as parameters in TypeScript, including use cases, syntax, and practical scenarios.
Learn more →
One Reply to "Cesium vs. Mapbox: Which mapping service is best?"
We have a App development company making us a bikeapp with point of interest and turn by turn navigation in react Native using Mapbox. This works very well in Android but not in iOS. Do you have any advice on how to make the API between Maxbox and React Native work on turn by turn navigation?