2021-11-05
1436
#react
Aditya Agarwal
122
Nov 5, 2021 ⋅ 5 min read

Understanding React compound components

Aditya Agarwal Loves experimenting on the web. You can follow me on Twitter @hackerrank.

Recent posts:

LLM routing in production: Choosing the right model for every request

Learn how LLM routing works in production, when it’s worth the complexity, and how teams choose the right model for each request.

Alexander Godwin
Feb 5, 2026 ⋅ 11 min read
React Svelte Next JS

Remix vs. Next.js vs. SvelteKit

Compare key features of popular meta-frameworks Remix, Next.js, and SvelteKit, from project setup to styling.

Alex Merced
Feb 4, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read
replay feb 4

The Replay (2/4/26): AI-first leadership, Tailwind layoffs, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the February 4th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Feb 4, 2026 ⋅ 37 sec read
ken pickering ai first organization

What it actually means to be an AI-first engineering organization

AI-first isn’t about tools; it’s about how teams think, build, and decide. Ken Pickering, CTO at Scripta Insights, shares how engineering leaders can adapt.

Ken Pickering
Feb 4, 2026 ⋅ 3 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Understanding React compound components"

  1. Hello!, this is a nice article, It helped me to understand this pattern a little bit better :), just one observation I have, in the code snippet you have in the article:

    “`
    const Tab = ({ id, children }) => (

    {({ changeTab }) => changeTab(id)}>{children}}

    );
    “`
    there is that ” > ” character in the return of the function inside that is confusing (I even thought it was a special new syntax of react…you never know! lol), then I checked the code sandbox provided, and I saw that the function was actually “({ changeTab }) => changeTab(id)}>{children}” which I was able to understand better.

    Maybe update the article’s code snippets to make it even clearer to new readers with less React experience,

    Thanks!

  2. It seems that the error on the syntax (that weird “>” character) is a problem of this CMS trying to clean up code that is being posted… uhm. well… maybe share the code snippets via https://gist.github.com instead of pasting directly in here. cheers

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now